Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #14302
| From | Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). |
| Date | 2012-02-20 09:04 +0900 |
| Message-ID | <87fwe6z7x4.fsf@catnip.gol.com> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <xn0hugm6dngyx6i009@news.astraweb.com> <712803.2037.1329645562216.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbfm8> <27450340.18.1329648569770.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbpw21> <87r4xqzzgy.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <67abe3b8-4dbf-445d-bda9-d51864fe9584@pq6g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> |
Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> writes: >> So i'd suggest: >> >> g++ -c -o mylib.o -O2 -march=native mylib.cpp >> g++ -c -o main.o -O2 -march=native main.cpp >> g++ -o executableneme main.o mylib.o > > Why no -O3? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#Optimize-Options > > -O3 > Optimize yet more. -O3 turns on all optimizations specified by -O2 > and also turns on the -finline-functions, -funswitch-loops, - > fpredictive-commoning, -fgcse-after-reload, -ftree-vectorize and -fipa- > cp-clone options. > > Function inlining is pretty important for C++. -O2 does comprehensive inlining as well -- including functions not marked "inline" -- using gcc's inlining heuristics, which are quite good these days. [What "-finline-functions" does is act as _every function_ were marked "inline" meaning gcc will be more likely to inline stuff, even when it doesn't think it's a good idea.] -O2 is a good default choice if want good optimization, but don't want to spend a lot of time benchmarking. -O3 includes optimizations that may be very expensive at compile-time or may result in excessive code bloat (and thus can have a negative effect on the icache etc). -O3 can _sometimes_ help, but it can also sometimes hurt, so it's a good idea to do some benchmarking to determine which is better. -Miles -- Cynic, n. A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be. Hence the custom among the Scythians of plucking out a cynic's eyes to improve his vision.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). Luca Cerone <luca.cerone@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 07:41 -0800
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). "Asger Joergensen" <Junk@Asger-P.dk> - 2012-02-17 16:45 +0000
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). lucacerone <luca.cerone@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 09:36 -0800
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). "Asger Joergensen" <Junk@Asger-P.dk> - 2012-02-17 17:50 +0000
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). lucacerone <luca.cerone@gmail.com> - 2012-02-19 01:59 -0800
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). lucacerone <luca.cerone@gmail.com> - 2012-02-19 02:49 -0800
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). "Asger Joergensen" <Junk@Asger-P.dk> - 2012-02-19 11:53 +0000
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2012-02-19 23:09 +0900
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2012-02-19 13:34 -0800
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). Marc <marc.glisse@gmail.com> - 2012-02-19 22:10 +0000
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2012-02-20 09:14 +0900
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-02-20 10:24 +0000
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2012-02-20 19:57 +0900
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2012-02-20 21:07 +0100
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-02-21 08:41 +0000
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-02-21 01:10 -0800
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2012-02-20 09:04 +0900
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). lucacerone <luca.cerone@gmail.com> - 2012-02-20 02:26 -0800
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-02-17 20:42 +0000
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). "Asger Joergensen" <Junk@Asger-P.dk> - 2012-02-17 22:20 +0000
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-02-17 20:52 +0000
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2012-02-17 15:57 -0500
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 15:01 -0800
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2012-02-18 08:44 -0500
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2012-02-18 09:20 -0600
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2012-02-18 09:36 -0600
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-02-18 20:19 +0000
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2012-02-19 10:32 +0900
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). lucacerone <luca.cerone@gmail.com> - 2012-02-20 02:36 -0800
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-02-20 06:48 -0800
Re: Writing efficient normal distribution function (for learning purposes). lucacerone <luca.cerone@gmail.com> - 2012-02-21 04:32 -0800
csiph-web