Re: Question about destructors

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:51:56 -0600
From	Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c++
Subject	Re: Question about destructors
References	<ba1d69e7-bd02-4c9a-9ab0-1f674fb3bc56@do4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <xn0hu2h1h91v2i4002@news.astraweb.com> <f7b07275-5374-4d4e-a679-44d9eb4cd719@eb6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <xn0hu2k3n9605fz003@news.astraweb.com> <jgrnqu$d87$1@dont-email.me> <2115496.607.1328686761742.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@proa7> <9petprFlo4U4@mid.individual.net>
Date	Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:51:56 +0000
Message-ID	<87ehu5ciwz.fsf@gmail.com> (permalink)
User-Agent	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:ZUqkfBZbV22fcype8n6v5AoNA2Y=
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Lines	14
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace	sv3-Vu8GtnaqIet02GbFTY6+/5ZQMa8D5q88IUdGDm4UPPkfIdOSTxjue6j49lzuSLc5+QRU4rvCh+X4k1/!+AdaPFoY1Ne023XBn3yyvtrgcsIQb/QMmKbyyrDo6wcV1fJQyAT1mBVAr5DNjEpn8TM=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	1887
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:13856

Show key headers only | View raw

Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> writes:
> On 02/ 8/12 08:39 PM, 88888 Dihedral wrote:
>> But for digital images and videos of tens of millions of pixels to be
>> processed the C++ vector adds overheads, too.
>
> No more than naked dynamic arrays.

Well, possibly a little bit more (default initialisation, storing the
length, and possibly some address calculation if you want to address it
as if it were multidimensional, in zigzag fashion, say. Nothing you
couldn't fix with a templated custom class, though.) 

And if those are the speed determining step of your algorithm, you're
doing it wrong.

Thread

Question about destructors Gus Gassmann <horand.gassmann@googlemail.com> - 2012-02-07 06:53 -0800
  Re: Question about destructors "Fred Zwarts \(KVI\)" <F.Zwarts@KVI.nl> - 2012-02-07 16:11 +0100
  Re: Question about destructors "Asger Joergensen" <Junk@Asger-P.dk> - 2012-02-07 15:38 +0000
    Re: Question about destructors Gus Gassmann <horand.gassmann@googlemail.com> - 2012-02-07 09:13 -0800
      Re: Question about destructors "Asger Joergensen" <Junk@Asger-P.dk> - 2012-02-07 17:34 +0000
        Re: Question about destructors Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2012-02-07 12:42 -0500
          Re: Question about destructors 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-02-07 23:39 -0800
            Re: Question about destructors Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-08 22:32 +1300
              Re: Question about destructors Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-02-08 17:51 +0000
                Re: Question about destructors Gert-Jan de Vos <gert-jan.de.vos@onsneteindhoven.nl> - 2012-02-08 10:47 -0800
      Re: Question about destructors SG <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 04:35 -0800
        Re: Question about destructors 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-02-11 08:17 -0800
  Re: Question about destructors Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2012-02-07 15:12 -0800
  Re: Question about destructors Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-02-08 06:38 +0000
    Re: Question about destructors Peter Remmers <p.remmers@expires-2011-04-30.arcornews.de> - 2012-02-09 00:30 +0100
      Re: Question about destructors Peter Remmers <p.remmers@expires-2011-04-30.arcornews.de> - 2012-02-09 00:56 +0100
      Re: Question about destructors Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 14:34 -0800
        Re: Question about destructors Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-02-13 17:48 +0000

csiph-web