Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #67749
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: newbie question: exceptions |
| Date | 2019-08-18 05:18 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <86r25ibrad.fsf@mailhub.linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <qiui12$5702$1@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl> <dafdfedc-45b0-4426-903b-c347eef24587@googlegroups.com> <8636hzcb91.fsf@mailhub.linuxsc.com> <06eeaff0-313d-4d9b-8f03-536185f59370@googlegroups.com> <45aa3238-fb53-42ef-99f9-ab2e71e5347d@googlegroups.com> |
Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> writes: > On Sunday, 18 August 2019 09:18:33 UTC+3, Tiib wrote: > >> On Sunday, 18 August 2019 08:07:31 UTC+3, Tim Rentsch wrote: >> >>> Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> writes: >>> >>>> On Tuesday, 13 August 2019 17:38:34 UTC+3, Jivanmukta wrote: >>>> [...] >>>> >>>>> Does it make sense to code: >>>>> >>>>> MyClass *myObj = MyClass(); >>>> >>>> No. It is usually syntax error, >>> >>> In most cases a diagnostic is required, but assuming MyClass >>> is a class (or struct), and there is no funny preprocessor >>> stuff going on, it is never a syntax error. >> >> I can demo that it is ill-formed on most trivial case: >> http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/aa95b9b7035de3c3 > > Ok. I think I got it ... you meant it is not syntax error but > semantic error. Right.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
newbie question: exceptions Jivanmukta <jivanmukta@poczta.onet.pl> - 2019-08-13 16:34 +0200
Re: newbie question: exceptions Jivanmukta <jivanmukta@poczta.onet.pl> - 2019-08-13 16:38 +0200
Re: newbie question: exceptions Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2019-08-13 17:02 +0200
Re: newbie question: exceptions Jivanmukta <jivanmukta@poczta.onet.pl> - 2019-08-14 10:06 +0200
Re: newbie question: exceptions "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-08-14 10:25 +0200
Re: newbie question: exceptions James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2019-08-14 08:41 -0400
Re: newbie question: exceptions "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-08-14 19:39 +0200
Re: newbie question: exceptions James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2019-08-14 19:47 -0400
Re: newbie question: exceptions "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-08-15 05:13 +0200
Re: newbie question: exceptions Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-08-14 10:18 +0000
Re: newbie question: exceptions Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2019-08-13 08:03 -0700
Re: newbie question: exceptions Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-08-17 22:07 -0700
Re: newbie question: exceptions Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2019-08-17 23:18 -0700
Re: newbie question: exceptions Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2019-08-18 00:05 -0700
Re: newbie question: exceptions Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-08-18 05:18 -0700
Re: newbie question: exceptions Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2019-08-13 17:39 +0200
Re: newbie question: exceptions Szyk Cech <szykcech@spoko.pl> - 2019-08-13 17:01 +0200
Re: newbie question: exceptions Szyk Cech <szykcech@spoko.pl> - 2019-08-13 17:03 +0200
Re: newbie question: exceptions Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2019-08-13 17:03 +0200
Re: newbie question: exceptions red floyd <dont.bother@its.invalid> - 2019-08-13 09:33 -0700
Re: newbie question: exceptions Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-08-14 00:37 +0000
Re: newbie question: exceptions Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> - 2019-08-24 08:32 +0200
Re: newbie question: exceptions Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-08-24 11:30 +0000
Re: newbie question: exceptions red floyd <dont.bother@its.invalid> - 2019-08-26 10:29 -0700
csiph-web