Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #84146
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions |
| Date | Tue, 17 May 2022 04:53:26 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 38 |
| Message-ID | <86o7zw2x55.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | <t5tc3s$164p$1@gioia.aioe.org> <t5u3kb$h0k$1@dont-email.me> <t5u6es$a95$1@dont-email.me> <t5u6uh$e6l$1@dont-email.me> <t5v928$1h9n$1@gioia.aioe.org> <87czgcqxgc.fsf@bsb.me.uk> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Injection-Info | reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0161277cd888cf27dddddc87a0dfb7f9"; logging-data="22139"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19hyoKn8qMrJ9lOTuJkpgZTqwN//w4+mw0=" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:XE3V+i3OjccTehUyOcCSfoa79nM= sha1:+5r9uh0N1GhRt1wAtERNvoF4T2U= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c++:84146 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> writes: > Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> writes: > >> Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> wrote: >> >>>> Re #5, I guess that the problem with >>>> >>>> long double value = 0.1; >>>> >>>> ... is that when `long double` doesn't have the same representation as >>>> `double`, one may get a less precise value than with >>>> >>>> long double value = 0.1L; >>>> >>>> Is that it? >>> >>> That's how I see it. 0.1 is a double constant and since 1/10 can't be >>> represented exactly in binary (assuming binary floats), the value in >>> "value" is not the closes approximation to 0.1 possible, which is 0.1L. >> >> It's easy to make such mistakes, and not just in variable initialization, >> but also pretty much anywhere where a literal is used, like: >> >> x = y * 0.1; // If x and y are long double, precision is lost > > 7.4 Usual arithmetic conversions > > (1.2) ? If either operand is of type long double, the other shall be > converted to long double. But that doesn't change the problem of potential loss of precision, because the representation (and hence the particular value) of the constant 0.1 is chosen before that value is converted to long double. The constant 0.1, being of type double, doesn't have to have less precision than 0.1L, but certainly it can.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
C++ (and some C) quiz questions Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-05-16 11:21 +0000
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-05-16 17:35 +0300
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-05-16 16:13 +0000
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-05-16 10:49 -0700
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2022-05-16 20:02 +0200
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2022-05-16 20:51 +0200
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2022-05-16 20:59 +0200
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-05-16 21:55 +0200
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2022-05-16 22:09 +0200
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-05-16 13:47 -0700
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-05-16 22:19 +0100
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-05-16 14:52 -0700
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-05-16 22:57 +0100
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-05-17 00:54 +0300
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-05-17 00:34 +0100
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2022-05-17 08:24 +0200
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-05-17 08:21 +0000
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-05-17 11:06 +0100
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-05-17 04:41 +0000
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-05-17 11:12 +0100
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-05-17 14:37 +0300
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-05-17 14:31 +0100
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-05-17 04:53 -0700
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-05-18 04:40 +0000
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-05-18 13:29 +0200
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-05-18 06:57 -0700
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-05-18 17:37 +0300
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-05-19 14:43 +0000
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-05-19 08:21 -0700
Re: C++ (and some C) quiz questions Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-05-18 06:01 -0700
csiph-web