Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #86858

Re: Simulating halt deciders refute the halting theorem

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: Simulating halt deciders refute the halting theorem
Date Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:31:05 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 19
Message-ID <864jwbiqt2.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink)
References <tht411$9s6g$1@dont-email.me> <thuib6$gidb$1@dont-email.me> <thv7k3$h9v6$14@dont-email.me> <20221009131628.275@kylheku.com>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="3c67835d7e1bd6fce16ecef79276b22a"; logging-data="900710"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+rCnzRT/oqbXgyMBwm6HC7R9Lax/Ijyck="
User-Agent Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:FGi8m0E0xGyim572ncaXyDUf+gg= sha1:rG0Y3ekdvzhJsdpn5Qvihw693iE=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.c++:86858

Show key headers only | View raw


Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> writes:

> On 2022-10-09, olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The halting theorem prevents any serious funding of termination analysis
>> research https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Termination_analysis
>
> Even if so, you're not making the best of use of the self-funding you
> have;  your research goes in circles.
>
> If you were funded, and they found out you just post volumes on
> Usenet without going anywhere, it's likely the funding would be
> swiftly cut off.
>
> It's not a probelm of money.

The problem here is you, responding to this idiot instead of just
ignoring him like all sensible people do.  And cross-posting only
makes it worse.

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Simulating halt deciders refute the halting theorem olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-10-08 19:18 -0500
  Re: Simulating halt deciders refute the halting theorem Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-10-09 09:23 +0000
  Re: Simulating halt deciders refute the halting theorem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-10-09 15:29 +0200
    Re: Simulating halt deciders refute the halting theorem olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-10-09 14:32 -0500
      Re: Simulating halt deciders refute the halting theorem Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2022-10-09 20:43 +0000
        Re: Simulating halt deciders refute the halting theorem Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-10-10 09:31 -0700
        Re: Simulating halt deciders refute the halting theorem olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-10-10 12:05 -0500

csiph-web