Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #3643
| Date | Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:53:13 -0700 |
|---|---|
| From | Phil Bouchard <phil@fornux.com> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: To standardize Boost.Pool |
| References | <4da38d4b@news.x-privat.org> <slrniq9ik7.gtj.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> <4da4eede@news.x-privat.org> <4da54bdd$1@news.x-privat.org> <5497ee99-8d91-4412-8995-6e1ea58ded81@32g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <4da5d23b@news.x-privat.org> <4da61a7b$1@news.x-privat.org> <4da62a76@news.x-privat.org> <Xns9EC74DE5814ACmyfirstnameosapriee@216.196.109.131> <4da68978@news.x-privat.org> |
| In-Reply-To | <4da68978@news.x-privat.org> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | $$alwkql$xhdv.news.x-privat.org |
| Message-ID | <4da68bcd@news.x-privat.org> (permalink) |
| Organization | X-Privat.Org NNTP Server - http://www.x-privat.org |
| Lines | 17 |
| X-Authenticated-User | $$tw5zurxc68swer- |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@x-privat.org |
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!newsfeed.x-privat.org!x-privat.org!not-for-mail |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:3643 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 4/13/2011 10:43 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: >> >> If Boost.Pool was standardized for process' memory areas its >> implementation would be quite implementation-specific anyway so there is >> no need to worry about such minor details like the suitable integer type, >> if such is needed at all. For example, in some x86 segmented memory >> models one could tell the type of the pointer just by looking at its >> segment selector, no address range comparisons needed. My apologies but I forgot mentioning that we wouldn't want if_from to get discredited before it upgrades to the standards. We are looking for both a standard compliant version of is_from and a system specific version of it. Thanks, -Phil
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
To standardize Boost.Pool Phil Bouchard <phil@fornux.com> - 2011-04-12 07:44 -0600
Re: To standardize Boost.Pool Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-04-12 21:56 +0000
Re: To standardize Boost.Pool Phil Bouchard <phil@fornux.com> - 2011-04-12 17:31 -0700
Re: To standardize Boost.Pool Phil Bouchard <phil@fornux.com> - 2011-04-13 00:08 -0700
Re: To standardize Boost.Pool Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2011-04-13 08:28 -0700
Re: To standardize Boost.Pool Phil Bouchard <phil@fornux.com> - 2011-04-13 09:41 -0700
Re: To standardize Boost.Pool Phil Bouchard <phil@fornux.com> - 2011-04-13 14:49 -0700
Re: To standardize Boost.Pool Phil Bouchard <phil@fornux.com> - 2011-04-13 15:57 -0700
Re: To standardize Boost.Pool Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-04-13 23:39 -0500
Re: To standardize Boost.Pool Phil Bouchard <phil@fornux.com> - 2011-04-13 22:43 -0700
Re: To standardize Boost.Pool Phil Bouchard <phil@fornux.com> - 2011-04-13 22:53 -0700
Re: To standardize Boost.Pool Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2011-04-14 15:55 +0900
Re: To standardize Boost.Pool Phil Bouchard <phil@fornux.com> - 2011-04-14 00:15 -0700
csiph-web