Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #14487
| From | Mike McCarty <mcmccarty@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Pointer Problem |
| Date | 2012-02-24 08:50 -0800 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <30064152.294.1330102204173.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbpw16> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <e365083e-3c7e-471f-8999-fe1024161199@gi10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <SbednbLbF-_RGdrSnZ2dnUVZ8kCdnZ2d@giganews.com> <1a33612f-5c15-41b6-80e2-5efc589ce966@s7g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <upidnQHsXYY4B9rSnZ2dnUVZ8qOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <ji8bjd$e2m$1@adenine.netfront.net> |
I'm not sure but I think Leigh is trying to say that your notion of "indirect" is irrelevant: typedef <something> P; typedef P* PP; typedef PP* PPP; typedef PPP* PPPP; typedef PPPP* PPPPP; PPPPP x = ppppp(); In the end, _x_ is a pointer to something of type PPPP. As far as _x_ is concerned, it really does not matter what PPPP is. If you try to evaluate _*x_, that's a different matter but then you're really no longer talking about _x_ at that point because _*x_ evaluates to a different (tho related) type. As for your point, well... I'm not really sure what your point is but I'm beginning to think that the two of you are in violent agreement, you just don't realize it.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Pointer Problem bintom <binoythomas1108@gmail.com> - 2012-02-16 06:51 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-02-16 15:15 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-02-16 07:17 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2012-02-16 11:15 -0500
Re: Pointer Problem scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-02-16 17:18 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2012-02-16 13:46 -0500
Re: Pointer Problem Mike McCarty <mcmccarty@gmail.com> - 2012-02-16 12:41 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-02-16 20:45 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-17 01:44 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-02-17 03:14 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-02-17 07:23 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-02-18 22:39 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem Peter Remmers <p.remmers@expires-2011-04-30.arcornews.de> - 2012-02-20 21:07 +0100
Re: Pointer Problem Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-21 18:49 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-21 18:49 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-02-22 10:15 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-22 07:49 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-02-22 20:24 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-02-23 10:36 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-23 18:59 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-02-23 19:15 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-23 21:08 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-02-23 21:17 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-02-23 21:29 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2012-02-23 17:06 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-24 03:42 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-02-24 12:33 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-24 15:09 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-02-23 20:53 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-24 04:11 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-02-24 12:36 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-24 06:07 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-02-24 14:11 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-24 15:49 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem Mike McCarty <mcmccarty@gmail.com> - 2012-02-24 08:50 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-24 18:47 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-24 13:44 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-26 12:41 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Mike McCarty <mcmccarty@gmail.com> - 2012-02-26 21:30 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-27 06:07 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Mike McCarty <mcmccarty@gmail.com> - 2012-02-27 07:25 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-27 08:17 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Mike McCarty <mcmccarty@gmail.com> - 2012-02-27 08:51 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-28 07:18 +1300
Re: Pointer Problem Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-27 11:32 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-27 11:32 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-02-27 19:17 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-27 11:49 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-02-27 20:04 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-27 12:55 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-02-27 21:15 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-27 14:26 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-27 11:21 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem SG <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2012-02-16 07:00 -0800
Re: Pointer Problem LR <lruss@superlink.net> - 2012-02-16 16:49 -0500
Re: Pointer Problem Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-02-16 22:18 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem LR <lruss@superlink.net> - 2012-02-16 23:40 -0500
Re: Pointer Problem Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-02-17 07:24 +0000
Re: Pointer Problem LR <lruss@superlink.net> - 2012-02-17 09:48 -0500
Re: Pointer Problem Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-02-17 15:13 +0000
csiph-web