Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully

From	Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com>
Newsgroups	comp.theory, comp.lang.c++, comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully
Date	2025-11-14 06:35 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<20251113221708.16@kylheku.com> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <10f5ti1$2hs87$1@dont-email.me> <20251113164050.449@kylheku.com> <10f5upq$2i4jm$1@dont-email.me> <20251113182603.463@kylheku.com> <10f64mo$2jch0$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 2025-11-14, olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/13/2025 8:32 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>> On 2025-11-14, olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> So you still don't understand that when H sees
>>> that D calls the same function twice in sequence
>>> with the same arguments and has no conditional
>>> code inbetween its invocation and this function
>>> call that this is isomorphic to infinite recursion?
>> 
>> No. Obvious counterexample:
>> 
>> void D(void)
>> {
>>    printf("calling this twice\n");
>>    // no conditionals here
>>    printf("calling this twice\n");
>> }
>> 
>> You're simply not able to run a simple specification through your head
>> to identify the ways in which it might not reflect your intent.
>> 
>
> Why do you post such ridiculous nonsense?

The above "D calls the same function (printf) twice in sequence with the
same arguments ("calling this twice\n") and has no conditional code
inbetween its invocation and this function call". It meets your
criteria; therefore it must be "isomorphic to infinite recursion".

> Are you a complete jackass or only partial?

I'm only conveying to you that the above function meets the words you
have written.

If you didn't intend that, that is your problem. I'm just the messenger.

Such a messenger wouldn't be necessary if you could think for yourself.

> This is my life's work and you baselessly
> denigrate it with stupid shit like resuming
> infinite recursion will cause it to halt.

When your life's work is being reviewed for publication, so that you can
become a renowned computer scientist, is this how you are going to
respond to your reviewers, and do you think that will work?

Your idea that when a decider abandons a simulation and returns zero,
the simuation is "totally killed" does not hold water. Mathematical
entities are never "killed". 

You should be glad that we caught this problem here, before
you took your life's work to academia for publication.

-- 
TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr
Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal
Mastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca

Thread

Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-13 18:36 -0600
  Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-13 18:57 -0600
    Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 02:32 +0000
      Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-13 20:38 -0600
        Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 06:35 +0000
          Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 08:13 -0600
            Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 18:01 +0000
              Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 12:19 -0600
  Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-13 20:39 -0600
  Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 09:38 +0100

csiph-web