Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #5135

Re: Customize operator new / delete

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2011-05-18 11:32:43 -0400, io_x said:

> 
> if you have 10000 C++ programs tha use the same routines
> could be good to have put all these routine in a .dll
> so one not have to load always the same code
> but it is load only one time, and so the space of memory
> where these routine are written- it is only one place
> 
> only static .data of the set of to these routines
> should  be in each process out of the .dll
> at last at what i belive to have understood

Yes, that's the theory. In practice, even Microsoft refers to this as 
"DLL hell". A typical system ends up with multiple, perhaps 
inconsistent, versions of various DLLs and often there's no good way of 
knowing which version will be selected for a particular application. 
The result is that your application may or may not work right, 
depending on which version of each of its DLLs gets loaded. Unless, of 
course, your application supplies its own version of every DLL that it 
uses.

-- 
  Pete
Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The 
Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference 
(www.petebecker.com/tr1book)

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Customize operator new / delete Nephi Immortal <immortalnephi@gmail.com> - 2011-05-07 19:11 -0700
  Re: Customize operator new / delete Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-08 15:05 +1200
  Re: Customize operator new / delete James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-05-08 07:38 -0700
    Re: Customize operator new / delete "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-05-08 19:05 +0200
      Re: Customize operator new / delete Nephi Immortal <immortalnephi@gmail.com> - 2011-05-08 15:35 -0700
        Re: Customize operator new / delete Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-09 10:45 +1200
      Re: Customize operator new / delete James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-05-10 13:25 -0700
        Re: Customize operator new / delete "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-05-11 09:31 +0200
          Re: Customize operator new / delete "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-05-11 09:56 +0200
            Re: Customize operator new / delete James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-05-15 06:14 -0700
              Re: Customize operator new / delete Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-05-15 23:54 -0700
                Re: Customize operator new / delete Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-16 19:43 +1200
                Re: Customize operator new / delete Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-05-16 12:53 +0100
              Re: Customize operator new / delete "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-05-18 17:32 +0200
                Re: Customize operator new / delete Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-18 12:38 -0400
          Re: Customize operator new / delete James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-05-15 06:12 -0700
  Re: Customize operator new / delete "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-05-08 18:44 +0200
    Re: Customize operator new / delete Nephi Immortal <immortalnephi@gmail.com> - 2011-05-08 15:43 -0700
      Re: Customize operator new / delete "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-05-09 08:47 +0200
        Re: Customize operator new / delete Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-05-09 12:58 +0100
          Re: Customize operator new / delete "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-05-10 08:15 +0200
            Re: Customize operator new / delete Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-05-10 12:39 +0100
        Re: Customize operator new / delete James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-05-10 13:29 -0700

csiph-web