Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #10672

Re: C++11 lambdas

From ChuanQi Tan <chuanqi.tan@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: C++11 lambdas
Date 2011-10-04 22:04 -0700
Organization http://groups.google.com
Message-ID <19244099.1201.1317791064110.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prng5> (permalink)
References <835cd0b9-b3e1-4aa2-bf61-f71760b8fb04@fi7g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


I thank you can think like this:

lambdas was a function that compiler do it for you, so you cannot declare a function that have a "auto" type argument

void (auto pair)
{
   ...
}

I think compiler cannot work!

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

C++11 lambdas Jerry <jerry.jeremiah@gmail.com> - 2011-09-19 15:40 -0700
  Re: C++11 lambdas Lucien Coffe <lcof@nospam.invalid> - 2011-09-20 06:38 +0000
  Re: C++11 lambdas Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-09-20 06:41 +0000
    Re: C++11 lambdas Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2011-09-20 16:57 +0900
    Re: C++11 lambdas Noah Roberts <roberts.noah@gmail.com> - 2011-09-20 08:23 -0700
      Re: C++11 lambdas Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-09-21 07:14 +0000
        Re: C++11 lambdas Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-09-21 18:25 -0400
  Re: C++11 lambdas ChuanQi Tan <chuanqi.tan@gmail.com> - 2011-10-04 22:04 -0700
    Re: C++11 lambdas Jerry <jerry.jeremiah@gmail.com> - 2011-10-23 15:21 -0700
      Re: C++11 lambdas Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2011-10-24 17:27 +0900

csiph-web