Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #124566
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c, comp.theory, comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Parking is more expensive than spinning (Re: What does Dmitry Vyukov teach us?) |
| Date | 2026-08-03 23:44 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <114r24d$tg0g$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <114ibo4$2q4sk$1@toylet.eternal-september.org> <114r1j1$tfll$2@solani.org> <114r1l2$tfll$3@solani.org> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Hi, One core problem in the design of algorithms for a large number of cores, such as found in a GPU, and in general, is the fact, that parking is most often more expensive than spinning. So if you have short wait times or few waiters , the cost model looks favorable if you use spinning, versus the same thing implemented with parking. The Java libraries by Doug Lea found in java.concurrency go even that far to use hybrid algorithms, that use spinning and parking. I guess its pretty easy, you just do backoff by using parking. Bye Mild Shock schrieb: > Hi, > > The clever soluton by Dmitry Vyukov shows > that the monitor is not necessarily canonical, when > we allow spinning. But spinning sometimes runs > > counter to what we expect an operating system > respectively a language runtime does with processes > and threads, namely they are parked. > > The absense of parking in GPU can now give the > false impression, that spinning is not allowed. > But why did Dmitry Vyukov develop his solution, > > and had a website called 1000 cores? Because > with a large number of cores and certain systolic > payloads, i.e. always enough work for all threads, > > the operating systems model of 2000 threads being > parked, this requirement can severly be challenged, > and allows a fundamental rethinking. > > Bye > > Mild Shock schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> Understanding the difference between Queue and Mutex? >> >> Mutex: A single binary semaphore >> >> Queue: A condition to signal non empty >> A condition to signal non full >> A monitor for the critical section >> >> Monitors were invented by Per Brinch Hansen >> and C. A. R. Hoare. Although the critical section >> could be modelled by a simple mutex, >> >> The condition wait has to leave the critical >> section temporarily, so the conditions sit on >> the monitor mutex. So who is the biggest moron? >> >> Well Chris M. Thomasson, I already talk like >> for one month, about the need for bounded queues, >> but all he can present recently was some >> >> C code for a spin backoff mutex? >> >> Bye >> >> Mr. Man-wai Chang schrieb: >>> >>> What is a genius programmer? >>> >> >
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What is a genius programmer (e.g. C, Pascal, Foxpro)? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-07-31 22:33 +0800
Re: What is a genius programmer (e.g. C, Pascal, Foxpro)? Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-31 22:47 +0800
Re: What is a genius programmer (e.g. C, Pascal, Foxpro)? BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-08-04 15:27 -0500
Re: What is a genius programmer (e.g. C, Pascal, Foxpro)? Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-08-05 05:22 +0800
Re: What is a genius programmer (e.g. C, Pascal, Foxpro)? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-08-05 07:24 +0000
Re: What is a genius programmer (e.g. C, Pascal, Foxpro)? R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-07-31 17:09 +0000
Re: What is a genius programmer (e.g. C, Pascal, Foxpro)? John McCue <jmclnx@gmail.com.invalid> - 2026-08-03 21:15 +0000
Understanding difference Queue and Mutex? (Was: What is a genius programmer) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-08-03 23:35 +0200
What does Dmitry Vyukov teach us? (Was: Understanding difference Queue and Mutex?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-08-03 23:36 +0200
Parking is more expensive than spinning (Re: What does Dmitry Vyukov teach us?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-08-03 23:44 +0200
In Praise of Slacking (Was: Parking is more expensive than spinning) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-08-03 23:56 +0200
Re: In Praise of Slacking (Was: Parking is more expensive than spinning) Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-08-04 08:29 +0800
You should write a blog about it [(Was: In Praise of Slacking) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-08-04 02:49 +0200
Re: You should write a blog about it [(Was: In Praise of Slacking) Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-08-04 09:47 +0800
csiph-web