Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot > #3460 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Graziani Candiotto <graz13@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-11-14 11:59 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-11-18 21:57 -0500 |
| Articles | 9 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot
Overlapping/Merge two density plot red and green scale using gnuplot Graziani Candiotto <graz13@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 11:59 -0800
Re: Overlapping/Merge two density plot red and green scale using gnuplot dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2016-11-15 21:13 -0500
Re: Overlapping/Merge two density plot red and green scale using gnuplot dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2016-11-15 21:45 -0500
Re: Overlapping/Merge two density plot red and green scale using gnuplot dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2016-11-16 00:51 -0500
Re: Overlapping/Merge two density plot red and green scale using gnuplot dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2016-11-16 07:41 -0500
Re: Overlapping/Merge two density plot red and green scale using gnuplot dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2016-11-17 21:32 -0500
Re: Overlapping/Merge two density plot red and green scale using gnuplot dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2016-11-18 00:42 -0500
Re: Overlapping/Merge two density plot red and green scale using gnuplot dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2016-11-18 00:46 -0500
Re: Overlapping/Merge two density plot red and green scale using gnuplot dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2016-11-18 21:57 -0500
| From | Graziani Candiotto <graz13@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-14 11:59 -0800 |
| Subject | Overlapping/Merge two density plot red and green scale using gnuplot |
| Message-ID | <093d02c9-93e0-4d98-b0ab-3144692fdd0a@googlegroups.com> |
Hello People, I would like to ask the follow question. How can I overlap/merge two density plot (in attach) using gnuplot. One image is in red scale and the other is in green scale. Density plot in red and green scale In theses two images the lowest value is white (background) and the highest values are represented by pure red [ RGB (255,0,0) ] and green [ RGB (0,255,0) ] scale. I looking for a way two overlap this two images, such that intersections are a combination of red and green to give a yellow intensity dependent on the "red" and "green" values. In summary I need that resultant image had red, green and yellow colors. I've tried some methods to interpolate the two images, but the resultant image is: interpolation I was expecting a light yellow [ RGB (255,255,0) ] color resultant but I get a dark yellow [ RGB (127,127,0) ]. How can I solve this problem using gnuplot. The data files and gnuplot script for the red and green images are available in the link below www.dropbox.com/s/teucom4uco283gp/overflow_example.tar.gz?dl=0 Thanks for attention.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dale <dale@dalekelly.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-15 21:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9sd4sr.9c6.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #3460 |
On 11/14/2016 2:59 PM, Graziani Candiotto wrote: > Hello People, > > I would like to ask the follow question. > > How can I overlap/merge two density plot (in attach) using gnuplot. One image is in red scale and the other is in green scale. > > Density plot in red and green scale > > In theses two images the lowest value is white (background) and the highest values are represented by pure red [ RGB (255,0,0) ] and green [ RGB (0,255,0) ] scale. > > > I looking for a way two overlap this two images, such that intersections are a combination of red and green to give a yellow intensity dependent on the "red" and "green" values. > > In summary I need that resultant image had red, green and yellow colors. > > I've tried some methods to interpolate the two images, but the resultant image is: > > interpolation > > I was expecting a light yellow [ RGB (255,255,0) ] color resultant but I get a dark yellow [ RGB (127,127,0) ]. How can I solve this problem using gnuplot. > > The data files and gnuplot script for the red and green images are available in the link below > > www.dropbox.com/s/teucom4uco283gp/overflow_example.tar.gz?dl=0 > > Thanks for attention. > not really into downloading stuff ... assuming a perfect additive RGB device/colorant system R=R G=G B=B simple mixing (R,G,B)= R/(R+G+B) + G/(R+G+B) + B/(R+G+B) round to nearest drive value, etc.. infinite drive is 255, have to catch this in code to get complementary colors cyan=255/R magenta=255/G yellow=255/B round to nearest drive value, etc.. infinite drive is 255, have to catch this in code if you want to device independence or device "consideration" you will need to add CIE, ICC, CIECAM, etc. calculations -- dale | http://www.dalekelly.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dale <dale@dalekelly.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-15 21:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9sd6po.kd5.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #3461 |
On 11/15/2016 9:13 PM, dale wrote: > simple mixing > (R,G,B)= R/(R+G+B) + G/(R+G+B) + B/(R+G+B) probably made the same err you did, you do need to add the secondary terms if you are mixing colorants and not mixing color, an equidistant color space like CIELUV you don't have the other terms R=255*(R/(R+G+B) + R+G/(R+G+B) + R+B/(R+G+B)) G ... B ... if you had a reference medium metric like RIMM,ERIMM,ROMM , see www.color.org , "reference devices" or something that is close and fits its purpose, you might assume equidistance there -- dale | http://www.dalekelly.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dale <dale@dalekelly.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-16 00:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9sdhl6.l0p.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #3462 |
On 11/15/2016 9:45 PM, dale wrote: > you do need to add the secondary terms are you doing your math in integers? rounding, clipping, etc. too? in your blue calculation you might be diving by infinity if you don't clip to 255, in eight bit calculations -- dale | http://www.dalekelly.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dale <dale@dalekelly.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-16 07:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9se9n1.vm2.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #3463 |
On 11/16/2016 12:51 AM, dale wrote: > On 11/15/2016 9:45 PM, dale wrote: >> you do need to add the secondary terms > > are you doing your math in integers? rounding, clipping, etc. too? > > in your blue calculation you might be diving by infinity if you don't > clip to 255, in eight bit calculations > okay, its been almost 20 years (R + G + B) needs clipped then rounded -- dale | http://www.dalekelly.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dale <dale@dalekelly.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-17 21:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9siep8.i2q.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #3460 |
On 11/14/2016 2:59 PM, Graziani Candiotto wrote: > Thanks for attention. where R,G,B are 8 bit integer intensities and r,g,b are intensities 255*((r + g + b) + (r + g + b))/(r + g + b) 255*((1 + 0 + 0) + (0 + 1 + 0))/(1 + 1 + 0) 255*(1+1)/(1+1) 255*1 255 where R,G,B are 8 bit integer intensities and r,g,b are intensities B=0 results in yellow equals 255 I could hack at a set operation later on ... -- dale | http://www.dalekelly.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dale <dale@dalekelly.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-18 00:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9sipsf.j97.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #3465 |
On 11/17/2016 9:32 PM, dale wrote: > > I could hack at a set operation later on ... okay, a matrix operation will do first [R,G,B]=[R]+[G]+[B] for your example you have [R]=255 [G]=255 [B]=0 [R,G,B]=[255]+[255]+[0]=[255,255,0] to get [C,M,Y] invert the [R,G,B] matrix or invert [R],[G].[B] then add the three matrices to get the inverse of [R,G,B] which is [C,M,Y] some other matrix inversion algorithms can be found on https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/math/inverses-and-determinants.html or https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/interpreter/Basic-Matrix-Functions.html -- dale | http://www.dalekelly.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dale <dale@dalekelly.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-18 00:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9siq54.j97.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #3466 |
On 11/18/2016 12:42 AM, dale wrote: > okay, a matrix operation will do first > > [R,G,B]=[R]+[G]+[B] to do this for more pixels at a time, add the dimensions of the image to the matrix and populate them -- dale | http://www.dalekelly.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dale <dale@dalekelly.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-18 21:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9sl4jn.cel.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #3466 |
On 11/18/2016 12:42 AM, dale wrote: > okay, a matrix operation will do first > > [R,G,B]=[R]+[G]+[B] you probably are adding the members of the matrices instead of adding the matrices, as I said its been about 20 years for me -- dale | http://www.dalekelly.org
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot
csiph-web