Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot > #2840
| From | giacomo boffi <pecore@pascolo.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot |
| Subject | Re: sensible defaults? |
| Date | 2015-03-22 10:30 +0100 |
| Organization | The Sun and the Rain. |
| Message-ID | <87twxd4bwr.fsf@pascolo.net> (permalink) |
| References | <87a8z6favz.fsf@pascolo.net> <melh2c$o7a$1@dont-email.me> <87384x5t3m.fsf_-_@pascolo.net> |
giacomo boffi <pecore@pascolo.net> writes:
> Or, in any other possible way, is it possible to have sensible
> defaults for monochrome plots, especially when working
> interactively?
At page 166 of the fine manual I finally found what I need!
| The set termoption command allows you to change the behaviour of the
| current terminal without requiring a new set terminal command. Only
| one option can be changed per command, and only a small number of
| options can be changed this way. Currently the only options accepted
| are
|
| set termoption {no}enhanced
| set termoption font "<fontname>{,<fontsize>}"
| set termoption fontscale <scale>
| set termoption {solid|dashed}
| set termoption {linewidth <lw>}{lw <lw>}
Let's try it
|$ gnuplot
|
| G N U P L O T
| Version 5.0 patchlevel 0 last modified 2015-01-01
|
| Copyright (C) 1986-1993, 1998, 2004, 2007-2015
| Thomas Williams, Colin Kelley and many others
|
| gnuplot home: http://www.gnuplot.info
| faq, bugs, etc: type "help FAQ"
| immediate help: type "help" (plot window: hit 'h')
|
|Terminal type set to 'qt'
|gnuplot> set term pdfcairo mono
|Terminal type set to 'pdfcairo'
|Options are ' transparent enhanced fontscale 0.5 monochrome size 5.00in, 3.00in '
|gnuplot> set termoption dashed
no message of sort! it must be OK...
|gnuplot> set out 'pippo.pdf'
|gnuplot> plot sin(x), cos(x)
|gnuplot> set out
|gnuplot> ! evince pippo.pdf &
|gnuplot>
but wait... both lines are solid lines...
is this a bug? what else can I try?
Back to comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[cairolatex] 4.6 -> 5.0 regression giacomo boffi <pecore@pascolo.net> - 2015-03-21 19:44 +0100
Re: [cairolatex] 4.6 -> 5.0 regression Ethan A Merritt <EAMerritt@gmail.com> - 2015-03-21 21:40 -0700
sensible defaults? (was: [cairolatex] 4.6 -> 5.0 regression) giacomo boffi <pecore@pascolo.net> - 2015-03-22 09:33 +0100
Re: sensible defaults? giacomo boffi <pecore@pascolo.net> - 2015-03-22 10:30 +0100
Re: sensible defaults? (was: [cairolatex] 4.6 -> 5.0 regression) Ethan A Merritt <EAMerritt@gmail.com> - 2015-03-22 11:20 -0700
Re: sensible defaults? (was: [cairolatex] 4.6 -> 5.0 regression) Alex A <alexandreychenko@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 06:07 -0700
Re: sensible defaults? (was: [cairolatex] 4.6 -> 5.0 regression) Alex A <alexandreychenko@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 06:49 -0700
csiph-web