Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.editors > #106346 > unrolled thread
| Started by | HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-06-10 13:19 -0700 |
| Last post | 2026-06-01 19:33 +0000 |
| Articles | 5 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.editors
(MS Word) ".doc" files are (sometimes?) unsafe to share HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> - 2024-06-10 13:19 -0700
Re: (MS Word) ".doc" files are (sometimes?) unsafe to share Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2024-06-13 05:36 +0200
Re: (MS Word) ".doc" files are (sometimes?) unsafe to share Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2024-06-13 14:14 +1000
Re: (MS Word) ".doc" files are (sometimes?) unsafe to share Tilde <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2024-08-01 22:31 -0600
Re: (MS Word) ".doc" files are (sometimes?) unsafe to share "HenHanna" <HenHanna@Posting.from.CsiPh> - 2026-06-01 19:33 +0000
| From | HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-10 13:19 -0700 |
| Subject | (MS Word) ".doc" files are (sometimes?) unsafe to share |
| Message-ID | <v47n4s$jt41$2@dont-email.me> |
i'm a bit annoyed when People send me (MS Word) .doc files,
because i must first convert them to .pdf before i can read them.
TIL (Today I Learn) that .doc files are (sometimes?) unsafe to share:
>>> people send them thinking they are sending text files...
and wind up sending an awful lot of metadata .... (like the undo
history). LibreOffice will read Word (.doc) files and let you export to
text, pdf, or rtf formats which are safe to share.
>>> university ... Vice-Chancellor who sent out "all staff"
memos by e-mail in MS-Word format. ...
.... composed them by taking an existing MS-Word file and altering
the contents. He apparently didn't know about the "revision history"
feature, ........ ended up leaking confidential documents.
https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/244902/can-i-be-sure-a-word-document-is-safe-if-it-doesnt-have-macros
>>> I am aware that MS Word documents can be potentially
dangerous due to the executable macros contained within them.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-13 05:36 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <9tpk6j1rgffc73t1oe2t0a2uiqhm6rkh7v@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #106346 |
On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:19:39 -0700, HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> wrote: > > i'm a bit annoyed when People send me (MS Word) .doc files, >because i must first convert them to .pdf before i can read them. > > >TIL (Today I Learn) that .doc files are (sometimes?) unsafe to share: If you can't read them, then they are not unsafe. Sometimes they might have macros, but the macros would have no effect unless you read them with MS-Word, which you obviously aren't doing. > >>> people send them thinking they are sending text files... >and wind up sending an awful lot of metadata .... (like the undo >history). LibreOffice will read Word (.doc) files and let you export to >text, pdf, or rtf formats which are safe to share. If I am sending people a document that I want them to add to or alter, I send it in RTF format, which most word processors can handle. If they just need to read it, then PDF is easier. > >>> university ... Vice-Chancellor who sent out "all staff" >memos by e-mail in MS-Word format. ... > .... composed them by taking an existing MS-Word file and altering >the contents. He apparently didn't know about the "revision history" >feature, ........ ended up leaking confidential documents. Yes, that is stupid. I send all emails in plain text, and if formatting is needed, I send it as a faile attachment. -- Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-13 14:14 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <v4drmn$23cvd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #106353 |
On 13/06/24 13:36, Steve Hayes wrote: > I send all emails in plain text, and if formatting is needed, I send > it as a faile attachment. I recently had to send a document to my uncle and a cousin, so I converted it to PDF first. It turned out that their mail provider (the same provider in both cases) rejected mail with a PDF attachment. I'm going to have to send it by snail mail. (Or perhaps it was rejected because my message was in plain text, with no HTML. I still haven't tracked down the precise cause.) Some mail providers are becoming tougher and tougher about rejecting mail for obscure reasons. (And sometimes they don't even tell the sender that the attempt failed.) Maybe we'll all have to go back to snail mail. -- Peter Moylan peter@pmoylan.org http://www.pmoylan.org Newcastle, NSW
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tilde <invalide@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-01 22:31 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <v8hnfi$2l98c$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #106354 |
Peter Moylan wrote: > On 13/06/24 13:36, Steve Hayes wrote: > I recently had to send a document to my uncle and a cousin, so I > converted it to PDF first. It turned out that their mail provider (the > same provider in both cases) rejected mail with a PDF attachment. I'm > going to have to send it by snail mail. Came across this looking at some older posts. Something I've successfully used many times in the past is to simply change the file extension (to ".txt" for example) and let the recipient know to save it with the correct extension. If the mailer only looks at the file name this gets through. Have not had to do this for quite a while, so YMMV.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "HenHanna" <HenHanna@Posting.from.CsiPh> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-06-01 19:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <6a1dde8a.0b35089303e28a21@csiph.com> |
| In reply to | #106354 |
This must be a thread that I started.
Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> wrote:
> On 13/06/24 13:36, Steve Hayes wrote:
>
> > I send all emails in plain text, and if formatting is needed, I send
> > it as a faile attachment.
>
> I recently had to send a document to my uncle and a cousin, so I
> converted it to PDF first. It turned out that their mail provider (the
> same provider in both cases) rejected mail with a PDF attachment. I'm
> going to have to send it by snail mail.
interesting !!!
>
> (Or perhaps it was rejected because my message was in plain text, with
> no HTML. I still haven't tracked down the precise cause.)
>
> Some mail providers are becoming tougher and tougher about rejecting
> mail for obscure reasons. (And sometimes they don't even tell the sender
> that the attempt failed.) Maybe we'll all have to go back to snail mail.
>
> --
> Peter Moylan peter@pmoylan.org http://www.pmoylan.org
> Newcastle, NSW
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.editors
csiph-web