Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.editors > #106991

Re: Are TABs a topic? ( was Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch [...])

Path csiph.com!news.nrbbs.org!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Mon, 12 Oct 2026 22:09:22 +0000
From steve g <Sgonedes1977@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.editors
Subject Re: Are TABs a topic? ( was Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch [...])
References <10tg96h$1g1mp$1@dont-email.me> <10tismt$2cmtr$1@dont-email.me> <10vnae7$35ho0$1@dont-email.me> <10vooj9$3uus7$9@dont-email.me>
Date Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:09:22 -0400
Message-ID <87fqyaefl9.fsf@gmail.com> (permalink)
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock sha1:Q0Tx/USGgopyB9KJSP5qLhFgbSc=
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
Lines 36
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace sv3-c2p47HncYUWW/s+6Y3wduf/b8rPWXlxVIFFPGhcf/1+to0BP0brIsAvj+q9mNANCfT2aaFSNmwH21SP!ma8BWsuUWZHuWATnTPOW3X5ZB+6jEXGr48cMR8zwz7462YE=
X-Complaints-To abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
Xref csiph.com comp.editors:106991

Show key headers only | View raw


Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> writes:

> On 2026-06-02 21:20, Mario Rosell wrote:
>>> [...]
>> I think TABs are cool because of this: you can set the indentation level
>> to what you are used to.
>
> Sure.
>
>> also saves space if you really need to squash four bytes.
>
> I think this is the weakest argument for TABs; it had been weak
> in former days already, and it's IMO quite ridiculous nowadays.


No it is not over! I want my backtab to work like the drawing on the key

Tab
<-----
----->

Why doesn't anyone use the backtab? never mind emacs has support for the
backtab; it runs si:backtab :)

> So that "Tabs vs. Spaces War" shouldn't be a topic nowadays since
> we have all options in principle (but maybe not in all editors).

That fight will never end; sendmail.cf has created a new generation of
people that want spaces and not tab; tab should not be inserted into the
user buffer because it is a gray key ?


> Janis
>
> PS: And since I don't see the topical relevance for "C" (or C++)
> I set Followup-to: comp.editors

Back to comp.editors | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Are TABs a topic? ( was Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch [...]) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-06-03 10:28 +0200
  Re: Are TABs a topic? ( was Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch [...]) Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-06-03 05:20 -0400
    Re: Are TABs a topic? ( was Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch [...]) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-06-03 14:50 +0200
    Re: Are TABs a topic? ( was Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch [...]) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-06-04 00:07 +0000
  Re: Are TABs a topic? ( was Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch [...]) steve g <Sgonedes1977@gmail.com> - 2026-10-12 18:09 -0400
    Re: Are TABs a topic? ( was Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch [...]) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-10-13 04:29 +0200

csiph-web