Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.editors > #106991
| Path | csiph.com!news.nrbbs.org!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Mon, 12 Oct 2026 22:09:22 +0000 |
| From | steve g <Sgonedes1977@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.editors |
| Subject | Re: Are TABs a topic? ( was Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch [...]) |
| References | <10tg96h$1g1mp$1@dont-email.me> <10tismt$2cmtr$1@dont-email.me> <10vnae7$35ho0$1@dont-email.me> <10vooj9$3uus7$9@dont-email.me> |
| Date | Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:09:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <87fqyaefl9.fsf@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:Q0Tx/USGgopyB9KJSP5qLhFgbSc= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Lines | 36 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| X-Trace | sv3-c2p47HncYUWW/s+6Y3wduf/b8rPWXlxVIFFPGhcf/1+to0BP0brIsAvj+q9mNANCfT2aaFSNmwH21SP!ma8BWsuUWZHuWATnTPOW3X5ZB+6jEXGr48cMR8zwz7462YE= |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@giganews.com |
| X-DMCA-Notifications | http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.editors:106991 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> writes: > On 2026-06-02 21:20, Mario Rosell wrote: >>> [...] >> I think TABs are cool because of this: you can set the indentation level >> to what you are used to. > > Sure. > >> also saves space if you really need to squash four bytes. > > I think this is the weakest argument for TABs; it had been weak > in former days already, and it's IMO quite ridiculous nowadays. No it is not over! I want my backtab to work like the drawing on the key Tab <----- -----> Why doesn't anyone use the backtab? never mind emacs has support for the backtab; it runs si:backtab :) > So that "Tabs vs. Spaces War" shouldn't be a topic nowadays since > we have all options in principle (but maybe not in all editors). That fight will never end; sendmail.cf has created a new generation of people that want spaces and not tab; tab should not be inserted into the user buffer because it is a gray key ? > Janis > > PS: And since I don't see the topical relevance for "C" (or C++) > I set Followup-to: comp.editors
Back to comp.editors | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Are TABs a topic? ( was Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch [...]) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-06-03 10:28 +0200
Re: Are TABs a topic? ( was Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch [...]) Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-06-03 05:20 -0400
Re: Are TABs a topic? ( was Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch [...]) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-06-03 14:50 +0200
Re: Are TABs a topic? ( was Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch [...]) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-06-04 00:07 +0000
Re: Are TABs a topic? ( was Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch [...]) steve g <Sgonedes1977@gmail.com> - 2026-10-12 18:09 -0400
Re: Are TABs a topic? ( was Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch [...]) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-10-13 04:29 +0200
csiph-web