Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.dsp > #6597 > unrolled thread

information theory?

Started byRichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com>
First post2011-10-31 20:55 -0700
Last post2011-11-03 08:28 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 77 — 36 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.dsp

Contents

  information theory? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2011-10-31 20:55 -0700
    Re: information theory? eric.jacobsen@ieee.org (Eric Jacobsen) - 2011-11-01 04:57 +0000
      Re: information theory? Chris <chris.santoro@gmail.com> - 2011-11-01 05:58 -0700
        Re: information theory? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2011-11-01 10:29 -0700
          Re: information theory? jim <retnuh2011@gmail.com> - 2011-11-01 11:13 -0700
            Re: information theory? jim <retnuh2011@gmail.com> - 2011-11-01 14:39 -0700
          Re: information theory? robert bristow-johnson <rbj@audioimagination.com> - 2011-11-01 16:04 -0400
            OT: information theory? Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> - 2011-11-01 18:06 -0400
            Re: information theory? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-11-01 22:46 +0000
          Re: information theory? "BJACOBY@teranews.com" <benj@iwaynet.net> - 2011-11-01 22:38 -0500
            Re: information theory? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2011-11-02 17:06 -0500
              Re: information theory? "steveu" <steveu@n_o_s_p_a_m.coppice.org> - 2011-11-02 19:41 -0500
              Re: information theory? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-11-03 06:58 -0500
                Re: information theory? "GO-HERE .NL" <gdewilde@gmail.com> - 2011-11-03 08:57 -0700
            Re: information theory? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2011-11-02 19:44 -0500
              Re: information theory? "Christopher J. Henrich" <chenrich@monmouth.com> - 2011-11-02 22:40 -0400
                Re: information theory? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2011-11-03 23:21 -0500
          Re: information theory? Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2011-11-02 08:47 +0000
            Re: information theory? (copyright question followup) JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2011-11-02 09:48 +0000
              Re: information theory? (copyright question followup) Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2011-11-02 10:02 +0000
                Re: information theory? (copyright question followup) Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2011-11-02 16:46 +0000
                Re: information theory? (copyright question followup) Bernd Jendrissek <bernd.jendrissek@gmail.com> - 2011-11-02 15:04 -0700
              Re: information theory? (copyright question followup) David Eather <eather@tpg.com.au> - 2011-11-03 04:00 +1000
                Re: information theory? (copyright question followup) unruh <unruh@physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-11-02 19:05 +0000
              Re: information theory? (copyright question followup) "J. Clarke" <jclarkeusenet@cox.net> - 2011-11-24 08:42 -0500
                Re: information theory? (copyright question followup) Richard Outerbridge <outer@interlog.com> - 2011-11-25 01:37 -0500
                  Re: information theory? (copyright question followup) Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2011-11-25 11:37 -0600
            Re: information theory? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2011-11-02 11:38 -0700
              Re: information theory? Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2011-11-03 08:51 +0000
          Re: information theory? Chris <chris.santoro@gmail.com> - 2011-11-02 08:02 -0700
            Re: information theory? robert bristow-johnson <rbj@audioimagination.com> - 2011-11-02 09:38 -0700
            Re: information theory? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2011-11-02 11:51 -0700
              Re: information theory? VWWall <vwall@large.invalid> - 2011-11-02 15:08 -0700
                Re: information theory? Richard Outerbridge <outer@interlog.com> - 2011-11-02 19:59 -0400
                  Re: information theory? Frederick Williams <freddywilliams@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-04 20:41 +0000
                    Re: information theory? "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> - 2011-11-04 16:59 -0500
                      Re: information theory? jim <retnuh2011@gmail.com> - 2011-11-04 15:28 -0700
                      Re: information theory? Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> - 2011-11-04 21:09 -0400
                        Re: information theory? ggr@nope.ucsd.edu (Greg Rose) - 2011-11-05 02:11 +0000
                        Re: information theory? Frederick Williams <freddywilliams@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-05 11:53 +0000
                      Re: information theory? "Mike Terry" <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2011-11-05 17:32 +0000
                  Re: information theory? jim <retnuh2011@gmail.com> - 2011-11-06 18:41 -0800
                Re: information theory? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2011-11-03 21:54 -0700
                  Re: information theory? "BJACOBY@teranews.com" <benj@iwaynet.net> - 2011-11-04 03:42 -0500
                  Re: information theory? "Peter Webb" <webbfamily@optusnetDIESPAMDIE.com.au> - 2011-11-04 20:33 +1100
                    Re: information theory? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-11-04 05:10 -0500
                      Re: information theory? kym@kymhorsell.com - 2011-11-04 10:50 +0000
                        Re: information theory? "Peter Webb" <webbfamily@optusnetDIESPAMDIE.com.au> - 2011-11-04 22:14 +1100
                          Re: information theory? "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse@phiwumbda.org> - 2011-11-04 09:13 -0400
                            Re: information theory? Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> - 2011-11-04 10:32 -0400
                              Re: information theory? "Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics.October.2011> - 2011-11-04 18:02 +0000
                                Re: information theory? jim <retnuh2011@gmail.com> - 2011-11-07 15:54 -0800
                        Re: information theory? VWWall <vwall@large.invalid> - 2011-11-04 09:50 -0700
                          Re: information theory? jim <retnuh2011@gmail.com> - 2011-11-04 12:41 -0700
                          Re: information theory? jim <retnuh2011@gmail.com> - 2011-11-04 13:40 -0700
                      Re: information theory? "Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics.October.2011> - 2011-11-04 11:35 +0000
                    Re: information theory? Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2011-11-04 10:31 +0000
                      Re: information theory? "Peter Webb" <webbfamily@optusnetDIESPAMDIE.com.au> - 2011-11-04 21:51 +1100
                      Re: information theory? "BJACOBY@teranews.com" <benj@iwaynet.net> - 2011-11-04 14:18 -0500
                      Re: information theory? Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> - 2011-11-04 15:56 -0400
                      Re: information theory? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-21 17:49 -0800
                        Re: information theory? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2011-12-21 20:07 -0600
                        Re: information theory? Richard Outerbridge <outer@interlog.com> - 2011-12-22 03:08 -0500
                          Re: information theory? Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2011-12-22 08:30 +0000
                            Re: information theory? John Devereux <john@devereux.me.uk> - 2011-12-22 10:12 +0000
                            Re: information theory? "Peter Webb" <r.peter.webbbbb@gmail.com> - 2011-12-22 21:14 +1100
                    Re: information theory? "Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics.October.2011> - 2011-11-04 11:00 +0000
                  Re: information theory? Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2011-11-04 09:45 +0000
                    Re: information theory? unruh <unruh@physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-11-04 19:05 +0000
                Re: information theory? jim <retnuh2011@gmail.com> - 2011-11-06 17:11 -0800
                  Re: information theory? jim <retnuh2011@gmail.com> - 2011-11-07 06:23 -0800
                    Re: information theory? jim <retnuh2011@gmail.com> - 2011-11-07 11:29 -0800
                    Re: information theory? jim <retnuh2011@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 04:41 -0800
                      Re: information theory? "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2011-11-08 13:46 -0500
              Re: information theory? "BJACOBY@teranews.com" <benj@iwaynet.net> - 2011-11-03 03:32 -0500
              Re: information theory? Chris <chris.santoro@gmail.com> - 2011-11-03 08:39 -0700
              Re: information theory? Chris <chris.santoro@gmail.com> - 2011-11-03 08:28 -0700

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

#6726

From"Mike Terry" <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com>
Date2011-11-05 17:32 +0000
Message-ID<496dnVZ3Dai_7ijTnZ2dnUVZ8gSdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
In reply to#6716

Could not fetch this article. Try the standalone view.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6739

Fromjim <retnuh2011@gmail.com>
Date2011-11-06 18:41 -0800
Message-ID<4cbcfd21-2be2-41b9-9df9-9c8c89d476ed@ek5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
In reply to#6650

Could not fetch this article. Try the standalone view.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6676

FromRichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com>
Date2011-11-03 21:54 -0700
Message-ID<9829d32f-ff08-490f-a3f9-9ef3d027e524@s10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
In reply to#6645

Could not fetch this article. Try the standalone view.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6678

From"BJACOBY@teranews.com" <benj@iwaynet.net>
Date2011-11-04 03:42 -0500
Message-ID<uzNsq.21722$yY3.5066@newsfe01.iad>
In reply to#6676

Could not fetch this article. Try the standalone view.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6680

From"Peter Webb" <webbfamily@optusnetDIESPAMDIE.com.au>
Date2011-11-04 20:33 +1100
Message-ID<4eb3b1c6$0$13394$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
In reply to#6676

Could not fetch this article. Try the standalone view.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6682

FromRobert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com>
Date2011-11-04 05:10 -0500
Message-ID<r6d7b7l6nt23kcu3n0cisoe85j0d6go5no@4ax.com>
In reply to#6680

Could not fetch this article. Try the standalone view.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6684

Fromkym@kymhorsell.com
Date2011-11-04 10:50 +0000
Message-ID<4eb3c38a$0$22471$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
In reply to#6682

Could not fetch this article. Try the standalone view.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6687

From"Peter Webb" <webbfamily@optusnetDIESPAMDIE.com.au>
Date2011-11-04 22:14 +1100
Message-ID<4eb3c94d$0$3032$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
In reply to#6684

Could not fetch this article. Try the standalone view.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6690

From"Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse@phiwumbda.org>
Date2011-11-04 09:13 -0400
Message-ID<87fwi4hvyc.fsf@phiwumbda.org>
In reply to#6687

Could not fetch this article. Try the standalone view.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6692

FromSpehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat>
Date2011-11-04 10:32 -0400
Message-ID<6ot7b7d7pkgh2c80oquvrd14chprebkob1@4ax.com>
In reply to#6690

Could not fetch this article. Try the standalone view.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6703

From"Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics.October.2011>
Date2011-11-04 18:02 +0000
Message-ID<VMVsq.9400$eC4.1950@newsfe16.ams2>
In reply to#6692

Could not fetch this article. Try the standalone view.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6776

Fromjim <retnuh2011@gmail.com>
Date2011-11-07 15:54 -0800
Message-ID<e8b71650-a29c-4d9d-9e92-56fd03e9f90f@c18g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
In reply to#6703

Could not fetch this article. Try the standalone view.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6698

FromVWWall <vwall@large.invalid>
Date2011-11-04 09:50 -0700
Message-ID<nfKdnfdoMtlQiinTnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
In reply to#6684

Could not fetch this article. Try the standalone view.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6706

Fromjim <retnuh2011@gmail.com>
Date2011-11-04 12:41 -0700
Message-ID<3c990293-7840-47e3-83fe-0e9369752826@v5g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>
In reply to#6698

Could not fetch this article. Try the standalone view.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6712

Fromjim <retnuh2011@gmail.com>
Date2011-11-04 13:40 -0700
Message-ID<5b8f0a08-f207-4a7a-872c-42a3c39ba41d@r7g2000vbg.googlegroups.com>
In reply to#6698

Could not fetch this article. Try the standalone view.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6688

From"Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics.October.2011>
Date2011-11-04 11:35 +0000
Message-ID<b6Qsq.20195$gy7.14022@newsfe28.ams2>
In reply to#6682

Could not fetch this article. Try the standalone view.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6683

FromMartin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk>
Date2011-11-04 10:31 +0000
Message-ID<I9Psq.13644$Mg.12196@newsfe13.iad>
In reply to#6680

Could not fetch this article. Try the standalone view.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6685

From"Peter Webb" <webbfamily@optusnetDIESPAMDIE.com.au>
Date2011-11-04 21:51 +1100
Message-ID<4eb3c3f8$0$13391$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
In reply to#6683

Could not fetch this article. Try the standalone view.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6705

From"BJACOBY@teranews.com" <benj@iwaynet.net>
Date2011-11-04 14:18 -0500
Message-ID<TTWsq.9240$am1.5190@newsfe05.iad>
In reply to#6683

Could not fetch this article. Try the standalone view.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6707

FromJerry Avins <jya@ieee.org>
Date2011-11-04 15:56 -0400
Message-ID<ErXsq.23162$0s1.5636@newsfe11.iad>
In reply to#6683

Could not fetch this article. Try the standalone view.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.dsp

csiph-web