Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.dcom.telecom > #512

Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom]

From danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com>
Newsgroups comp.dcom.telecom
Subject Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom]
Date 2011-04-30 12:33 +0000
Organization The Telecom Digest
Message-ID <ipgviv$oo4$2@reader1.panix.com> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <cc6e57e8-37d7-4f76-9bb3-be7c0856bdb3@dn9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <jonjr6h5fnk3rgf4kc64j27d010q1ksjs8@4ax.com> <20110429000058.19922.qmail@gal.iecc.com> <eYidnWLhaK20xCfQnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@megapath.net> <4b3f1330b939dddadb89d545d8581239.squirrel@webmail.mishmash.com>

Show all headers | View raw


>     Also, it would be a good idea to go to the FTC Web site and report
>whichever company is continuing to call you.  If they get enough
>complaints, they'll at least send them a warning letter.

Not meaning to dump on the poster here, but what proof do
we have that the FTC (and the related for this purpose, FCC)
does even this diddlysquat? Yes, we see the periodic press releases
that they put out, but as of last month I was _still_ getting
calls from "Rachel of Card Services", and the feds have gotten
thousands, perhaps tens of thousands... or hundreds...
of complaints.

She's been at it for literally (and I mean that literally) years.

For that matter, where in their enabling legislation is
there a provision that states "ignore the public and
disregard violations of the law unless you get X number
of complaints"?
 

-- 
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
		     dannyb@panix.com 
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]

Back to comp.dcom.telecom | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost   [telecom] danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com> - 2011-04-30 12:33 +0000
  Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost     [telecom] Sam Spade <sam@coldmail.com> - 2011-05-01 03:18 -0700
    Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) - 2011-05-06 03:02 -0500
      Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] Lisa or Jeff <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> - 2011-05-06 19:14 -0700

csiph-web