Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.dcom.telecom > #512
| From | danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.dcom.telecom |
| Subject | Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] |
| Date | 2011-04-30 12:33 +0000 |
| Organization | The Telecom Digest |
| Message-ID | <ipgviv$oo4$2@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <cc6e57e8-37d7-4f76-9bb3-be7c0856bdb3@dn9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <jonjr6h5fnk3rgf4kc64j27d010q1ksjs8@4ax.com> <20110429000058.19922.qmail@gal.iecc.com> <eYidnWLhaK20xCfQnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@megapath.net> <4b3f1330b939dddadb89d545d8581239.squirrel@webmail.mishmash.com> |
> Also, it would be a good idea to go to the FTC Web site and report >whichever company is continuing to call you. If they get enough >complaints, they'll at least send them a warning letter. Not meaning to dump on the poster here, but what proof do we have that the FTC (and the related for this purpose, FCC) does even this diddlysquat? Yes, we see the periodic press releases that they put out, but as of last month I was _still_ getting calls from "Rachel of Card Services", and the feds have gotten thousands, perhaps tens of thousands... or hundreds... of complaints. She's been at it for literally (and I mean that literally) years. For that matter, where in their enabling legislation is there a provision that states "ignore the public and disregard violations of the law unless you get X number of complaints"? -- _____________________________________________________ Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key dannyb@panix.com [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
Back to comp.dcom.telecom | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com> - 2011-04-30 12:33 +0000
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] Sam Spade <sam@coldmail.com> - 2011-05-01 03:18 -0700
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) - 2011-05-06 03:02 -0500
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] Lisa or Jeff <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> - 2011-05-06 19:14 -0700
csiph-web