Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.dcom.telecom > #14077
| From | "The Telecom Digest" <submissions@telecom-digest.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.dcom.telecom |
| Subject | New Hamshire VoIP provider asks FCC Chairwoman for help [telecom] |
| Date | 2023-04-30 19:17 -0400 |
| Organization | The Telecom Digest |
| Message-ID | <20230430231727.GA188317@telecomdigest.us> (permalink) |
April 6, 2023 (Via ECFS) Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street Washington, DC 20554 Re: WC Docket 17-97 - Call Authentication Trust Anchor Dear Chairwoman Rosenworcel, We are a relatively small VoIP provider based in Nashua, New Hampshire with customers around the country spanning from large auto dealerships to over 1,200 restaurants. Recently, over the past few months, we began to receive complaints from our customers regarding a change in the presentation of Caller ID, particularly the CNAM (or customer name) portion. The complaints ranged from calls being labeled "spam risk" to "city, state" and other misleading labels. We've been Stir/Shaken compliant for several months and sign all of our calls. The removal of CNAM and the mislabeling of our calls has served to create harm both to our customers' businesses and to our reputation as their provider. The worst of this is the resulting lack of faith developing in the public phone system's seeming inability to label calls correctly as well as calls not completing because called parties are not answering their phones because the customer name is missing or the call is mislabeled. I would like to chalk this up to the law of unintended consequences but the fact remains that this recent phenomenon has been somewhat of a secret. We received no pertinent information from any of our upstream partners that would have indicated that this practice was occurring and what the possible remedy or remedies might be. As a matter of fact, we only discovered the possible reasons for this after doing a fair amount of digging via repeated Google searches uncovering companies like Hiya, TNS and First Orion that we understand are responsible for call analytics. https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10406144565925/1
Back to comp.dcom.telecom | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
New Hamshire VoIP provider asks FCC Chairwoman for help [telecom] "The Telecom Digest" <submissions@telecom-digest.org> - 2023-04-30 19:17 -0400
csiph-web