Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.dcom.telecom > #13330
| From | Bill Horne <malQRMassimilation@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.dcom.telecom |
| Subject | Re: [telecom] KY: (Opinion) Our 9-1-1 system desperately needs federal money for upgrades |
| Date | 2022-09-14 18:29 +0000 |
| Organization | The Telecom Digest |
| Message-ID | <20220914182952.GA316900@telecomdigest.us> (permalink) |
| References | <4743d3fc-9416-4ff3-f381-8ef5d33b0de9@gmail.com> |
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 03:50:15PM -0400, Bill Horne wrote: > Since its inception, 9-1-1 has been a victim of its own success. Ninety-nine > percent of the time, it just works, and people ignore it. Government leaders > have an “if it’s not broke, why fix it” mentality. > > Unfortunately, this approach is short-sighted and puts lives at risk. Simply > put, 9-1-1 will increasingly fail to meet the needs of Kentuckians and > Americans unless it is upgraded to Next Generation 9-1-1 technology (NG911) > — and this can only be achieved through an infusion of federal funding. I am always leery of "VoIP" networks, and this author's opinion notwithstanding, I don't think they are a good idea for carrying /any/ kind of emergency communications. There are at least two things wrong with the idea of using IP-based connections to carry 911 traffic: 1. The basic, fundamental, underlying premise of the Internet's design is that any particular packet can wait until a route is available, and the packets that transport a 911 Voice-over-Internet-Protocal (VoIP) connection *MUST* be given priority over other traffic - but there is no mechanism in place to do that. VoIP is fine for my home phone (if my ISP ever stops blocking it), but it's *NOT* a reliable way to provide the "always on" connections needed for a PSAP to talk to those in need of help. 2. Deep down in the glib come-on for the IP network which is supposed to provide the virtual circuits that 911 must have, there is a tiny little tell-all that gives the project's *REAL* purpose away. The NSInet details say that all traffic will be carried over "private" or "virtually private" paths. We all know what Virtual Private Networks are - but what they are *NOT* is a virtual circuit, and the fact that they're going to be used for the "new 911" tells me that this allegedly "advanced" system will be composed of a few concentrated cubicle farms in each state (if even that), trying to use technology to relieve the ever-more-hungry politicians of any obligation to hire and pay the multi-lingual, multi-cultural specialists that currect E911 PSAPs are supposed to have on duty at all times. Of course, if multi-lingual labor can't be found, there will always be the temptation to "offshore" the centers overseas ... You heard it here first. Bill Horne -- (Please remove QRM from my email address to write to me directly, and please note that the Telecom Digest's email address must be modified in an obvious way to reply to this post via email.)
Back to comp.dcom.telecom | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
KY: (Opinion) Our 9-1-1 system desperately needs federal money for upgrades [telecom] Bill Horne <malQRMassimilation@gmail.com> - 2022-09-13 15:50 -0400 Re: [telecom] KY: (Opinion) Our 9-1-1 system desperately needs federal money for upgrades Bill Horne <malQRMassimilation@gmail.com> - 2022-09-14 18:29 +0000
csiph-web