Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.databases > #116

Re: Binary Relational Modeling - hint

Show all headers | View raw

On 09/07/2011 02:54 PM, Ivan wrote:
> about brm: it's a paradigm that describes a simple, yet powerful
> rules and cool graphs for database definition. join the group for
> brm learning and discussing issues at:
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/binary-relational-model

Frankly, to me this looks like a crippled version of ERM.  You cannot 
even express distinct 1:1 relationships directly as well certain other 
aspects of real life.  My gut feeling tells me, this idea is unlikely to 
take off.  Why should I use a simple model in order to model real world 
situations which are significantly more complex than the capabilities of 
the model when I can use a more adequate model?

Regards

	robert

Back to comp.databases | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Binary Relational Modeling - hint Ivan <ivanvodisek@gmail.com> - 2011-09-07 05:54 -0700
  Re: Binary Relational Modeling - hint Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-07 17:58 +0200
    Re: Binary Relational Modeling - hint Ivan <ivanvodisek@gmail.com> - 2011-09-09 12:13 -0700
      Re: Binary Relational Modeling - hint Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-09 22:32 +0200
        Re: Binary Relational Modeling - hint Ivan <ivanvodisek@gmail.com> - 2011-09-09 14:29 -0700
  Re: Binary Relational Modeling - hint "Robert Czub" <robert.czu@gmail.com> - 2011-10-12 21:02 +0200

csiph-web