Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.databases > #352

Thread safe

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!webuse.net!not-for-mail
From "daydreamer" <sundaresh.venugopal@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.databases
Subject Thread safe
Message-ID <20130214035600392@webuse.net> (permalink)
Date Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:56:00 GMT
X-Newsreader www.webuse.net
X-Complaints-To abuse@webuse.net
NNTP-Posting-Host 117.202.104.113
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Xref csiph.com comp.databases:352

Show key headers only | View raw


I have a tree of recursive small hash tables. A small part of each hash
table is stored in memory and the actual tables, in a file. This is for
a simple experimental hash/trie based database organization.I wish to
make this database thread safe. I intend to do so at the hash table
level, to permit several threads to simultaneously read the hash table,
but only one thread at a time to write or change the hash table. What is
the best way to do accomplish this ? Also what happens if a thread
holding a write
lock on a hash table is abruptly terminated, never releasing that lock,
for other threads to access the table ? 

Posted using www.webuse.net 

Back to comp.databases | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Thread safe "daydreamer" <sundaresh.venugopal@gmail.com> - 2013-02-14 03:56 +0000
  Re: Thread safe Kees Nuyt <k.nuyt@nospam.demon.nl> - 2013-02-14 22:33 +0100
    Re: Thread safe "daydreamer" <sundaresh.venugopal@gmail.com> - 2013-02-15 04:07 +0000

csiph-web