Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.databases.xbase.codebase > #19 > unrolled thread

CodeBase for C

Back to article view | Back to comp.databases.xbase.codebase

Contents

  CodeBase for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 20:33 +0800
    Re: CodeBase for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 20:35 +0800
    Re: CodeBase for C "Geoff Barnard" <geoff@jgb17.co.uk> - 2016-11-24 22:49 +0000
      Re: CodeBase for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-25 16:59 +0800
        Re: CodeBase for C "Geoff Barnard" <geoff@jgb17.co.uk> - 2016-11-25 13:46 +0000

#19 — CodeBase for C

Anyone used it before? Is it faster than SQLite?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#20

On 21/11/2016 8:33 PM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
>
> Anyone used it before? Is it faster than SQLite?

http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~CodeBase

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#21

Hello,

Don't know?   Please detail just what you mean.

I'm using CodeBase 5 (Sequiter) both single user and via network, with some 
fairly large files, and generally it's pretty fast, but it's really 
dependant on memory available, and programming, and just what any specific 
program is trying to do.   To answer your question in the limited way you 
ask it, I'd need to create a program that does the same 'task' on the same 
system (network or stand alone ?) and time each.

If an operation can be made server-intensive, I'd expect that the SQL 
version could be faster.   If there's a LOT of user interaction required, 
then I'd expect that the CodeBase version could be faster.   Again, memory 
available could make a difference.

Happy to discuss further?

Geoff


"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:o0upi3$l85$1@dont-email.me...
>
> Anyone used it before? Is it faster than SQLite? 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22

On 25/11/2016 6:49 AM, Geoff Barnard wrote:
> I'm using CodeBase 5 (Sequiter) both single user and via network, with some
> fairly large files, and generally it's pretty fast, but it's really
> dependant on memory available, and programming, and just what any specific
> program is trying to do.   To answer your question in the limited way you
> ask it, I'd need to create a program that does the same 'task' on the same
> system (network or stand alone ?) and time each.

1. Does CodeBase 5 have SQL commands?

2. Did you also try SQLite?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#23

No, CodeBase 5 does not directly support any SQL commands, although you will 
be aware that many of the commands available within xbase are very similar 
to many SQL commands, and both may have a similar origin.   So a lot of what 
you might do with SQL can be achieved with CodeBase.

No, I have not used SQLite, although I have used SQL and MySQL, using 
FreeBasic software.

Geoff


"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:o18ueo$e27$6@dont-email.me...
> On 25/11/2016 6:49 AM, Geoff Barnard wrote:
>> I'm using CodeBase 5 (Sequiter) both single user and via network, with 
>> some
>> fairly large files, and generally it's pretty fast, but it's really
>> dependant on memory available, and programming, and just what any 
>> specific
>> program is trying to do.   To answer your question in the limited way you
>> ask it, I'd need to create a program that does the same 'task' on the 
>> same
>> system (network or stand alone ?) and time each.
>
> 1. Does CodeBase 5 have SQL commands?
>
> 2. Did you also try SQLite?
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.databases.xbase.codebase

csiph-web