Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.databases.postgresql > #61 > unrolled thread

Re: posygresql and hot stand by

Started byhitan <hitan@hunt.it>
First post2011-03-29 13:35 +0200
Last post2011-03-29 13:35 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.databases.postgresql

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: posygresql and hot stand by hitan <hitan@hunt.it> - 2011-03-29 13:35 +0200

#61 — Re: posygresql and hot stand by

Fromhitan <hitan@hunt.it>
Date2011-03-29 13:35 +0200
SubjectRe: posygresql and hot stand by
Message-ID<imsg64$1kt$1@tdi.cu.mi.it>
Il 28/03/2011 18.21, Mladen Gogala ha scritto:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:53:35 +0200, hitan wrote:
>
>> Hello, I have a problem with postgresql 9, you can exclude some tables
>> from the hot standby , because I have some tables that do not need to be
>> replicated
>>
>> Tanks
>
> Postgres 9 replication is not SQL based,you cannot exclude anything. What
> PostgreSQL gives you is an exact replica of your database cluster. If you
> want a schema based replication, try with Slony. It's easy to set up,
> supported by PgAdmin and very reliable, according to my experience.
>
>
>
thanks, but already use Slony, I wanted to replicate with native postgresql

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.databases.postgresql


csiph-web