Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.databases.postgresql > #61 > unrolled thread
| Started by | hitan <hitan@hunt.it> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-03-29 13:35 +0200 |
| Last post | 2011-03-29 13:35 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.databases.postgresql
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: posygresql and hot stand by hitan <hitan@hunt.it> - 2011-03-29 13:35 +0200
| From | hitan <hitan@hunt.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-03-29 13:35 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: posygresql and hot stand by |
| Message-ID | <imsg64$1kt$1@tdi.cu.mi.it> |
Il 28/03/2011 18.21, Mladen Gogala ha scritto: > On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:53:35 +0200, hitan wrote: > >> Hello, I have a problem with postgresql 9, you can exclude some tables >> from the hot standby , because I have some tables that do not need to be >> replicated >> >> Tanks > > Postgres 9 replication is not SQL based,you cannot exclude anything. What > PostgreSQL gives you is an exact replica of your database cluster. If you > want a schema based replication, try with Slony. It's easy to set up, > supported by PgAdmin and very reliable, according to my experience. > > > thanks, but already use Slony, I wanted to replicate with native postgresql
Back to top | Article view | comp.databases.postgresql
csiph-web