Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.databases.postgresql > #407
| From | Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.databases.postgresql |
| Subject | Re: index on a partitioned table |
| Date | 2012-08-17 19:31 +0000 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Message-ID | <pan.2012.08.17.19.30.50@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <k0jbq5$n53$2@dont-email.me> |
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:48:53 +0000, Greg Hennessy wrote: > I am using postgresql 8.1.3 on redhat, and trying to use partitioned > tables to manage a multi-terabyte table. I've created the parent table > and the child tables. > > If I want to add an index, does it matter if I index the parent or the > collection of children? I can't find a discussion of the pros or cons on > this in the documentation. In Postgres, parent table is usually empty. You can only index child tables. And there are no global indexes, it isn't possible to have a unique index across all the tables. -- Mladen Gogala http://mgogala.freehostia.com
Back to comp.databases.postgresql | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
index on a partitioned table Greg Hennessy <greg.hennessy@cox.net> - 2012-08-16 17:48 +0000 Re: index on a partitioned table Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-17 11:11 +0200 Re: index on a partitioned table Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> - 2012-08-17 19:31 +0000 Re: index on a partitioned table Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2012-08-18 00:30 +0000
csiph-web