Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.databases.ms-sqlserver > #987 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-04-18 14:54 -0700 |
| Last post | 2012-04-21 00:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 11 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.databases.ms-sqlserver
Problem Reinstalling SQL Server Express 2008 under Windows 7 Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-04-18 14:54 -0700
Re: Problem Reinstalling SQL Server Express 2008 under Windows 7 Big Steel <YouCanRun@ButYouCannotHide.com> - 2012-04-18 21:10 -0400
Re: Problem Reinstalling SQL Server Express 2008 under Windows 7 Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-04-18 18:20 -0700
Re: Problem Reinstalling SQL Server Express 2008 under Windows 7 Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2012-04-18 22:06 -0500
Re: Problem Reinstalling SQL Server Express 2008 under Windows 7 Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2012-04-19 22:46 +0200
Re: Problem Reinstalling SQL Server Express 2008 under Windows 7 Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-04-19 20:18 -0700
Re: Problem Reinstalling SQL Server Express 2008 under Windows 7 Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2012-04-20 09:17 +0200
Re: Problem Reinstalling SQL Server Express 2008 under Windows 7 Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-04-19 22:29 -0700
Re: Problem Reinstalling SQL Server Express 2008 under Windows 7 Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2012-04-20 09:22 +0200
Re: Problem Reinstalling SQL Server Express 2008 under Windows 7 Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-04-20 08:18 -0700
Re: Problem Reinstalling SQL Server Express 2008 under Windows 7 Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2012-04-21 00:20 +0200
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-18 14:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Problem Reinstalling SQL Server Express 2008 under Windows 7 |
| Message-ID | <kcduo7hllbdo84g73dt6rjsko25od0b5em@4ax.com> |
Dear SQL and Windows 7 People:
I have a system running Windows 7. It is not my main system, and
I have not installed much on it.
I installed SQL Server Express 2008 on it. I also installed SQL
Server Denali. The Denali installation ended up replacing my SSMS
with the Denali one. Because of some differences in the behaviour of
the SSMS, I wanted 2008's SSMS back.
I uninstalled both SQL Server versions and deleted all files in
the SQL Server directories in C:\Program Files and c:\Program Files
(x86). Not knowing what to do about any possible Registry trash, I
did nothing to the Registry.
I then installed SQL Server 2008 Express. The installation was
successful. Well, that is what I was told. There was no SSMS! I
have tried yet again (uninstall then install), and the same thing
happened again.
I could just nuke the box and restart, but I would rather avoid
something that extreme and time-consuming.
Is there anything I can do, or does this system get to be a
sacrificial goat to the evil god ReinstallFromOSOnUp?
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Steel <YouCanRun@ButYouCannotHide.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-18 21:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <GJOdnYG075O--xLSnZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #987 |
On 4/18/2012 5:54 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: <snipped> I would say flatten the HD, install the O/S and install SQL Server. You probably did something that's unrecoverable, keeping it simple.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-18 18:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <nrpuo7l8b25lbnpo7lapq1teolalo84api@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #988 |
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:10:54 -0400, Big Steel
<YouCanRun@ButYouCannotHide.com> wrote:
>On 4/18/2012 5:54 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
><snipped>
>
>I would say flatten the HD, install the O/S and install SQL Server. You
>probably did something that's unrecoverable, keeping it simple.
Well, having already managed to toast an XP system so that SQL
Server could not be reinstalled, that is certainly credible.
I wish I knew what it was that I did.
I am trying YA installation with YA version of SSE2008 -- there
are too many of them -- and maybe, it will work. If not, I suppose I
will nuke it tomorrow.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-18 22:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1a0vo7d9nn4vqsk97rdt02h37ne6mp333q@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #989 |
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:20:51 -0700, Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> wrote: >On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:10:54 -0400, Big Steel ><YouCanRun@ButYouCannotHide.com> wrote: > >>On 4/18/2012 5:54 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: >> >><snipped> >> >>I would say flatten the HD, install the O/S and install SQL Server. You >>probably did something that's unrecoverable, keeping it simple. > > Well, having already managed to toast an XP system so that SQL >Server could not be reinstalled, that is certainly credible. > > I wish I knew what it was that I did. > > I am trying YA installation with YA version of SSE2008 -- there >are too many of them -- and maybe, it will work. If not, I suppose I >will nuke it tomorrow. What's the status of your backups? -- Char Jackson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-19 22:46 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA03AE79B09533Yazorman@127.0.0.1> |
| In reply to | #987 |
Gene Wirchenko (genew@ocis.net) writes: > I installed SQL Server Express 2008 on it. I also installed SQL > Server Denali. The Denali installation ended up replacing my SSMS > with the Denali one. Because of some differences in the behaviour of > the SSMS, I wanted 2008's SSMS back. No, installing SQL 2012 does not replace SSMS 2008. I have both versions installed my system. (However, naîvely accepting "do you want to transfer your settings for SSMS 2008 to SQL Server 2012, some of the settings were transferred in the other direction.) Mind you, this was developer edition, not Express, but I fail to see that should make a difference. > I then installed SQL Server 2008 Express. The installation was > successful. Well, that is what I was told. There was no SSMS! A plain installation of SQL 2008 Express does not include SSMS. You need SQL 2008 Express with Advanced Services, as I recall. -- Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se Links for SQL Server Books Online: SQL 2008: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sqlserver/cc514207.aspx SQL 2005: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sqlserver/bb895970.aspx
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-19 20:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <95l1p7d5jc4ebmeqt47r1ekei2tc888vgb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #993 |
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:46:03 +0200, Erland Sommarskog
<esquel@sommarskog.se> wrote:
>Gene Wirchenko (genew@ocis.net) writes:
[snip]
>> I then installed SQL Server 2008 Express. The installation was
>> successful. Well, that is what I was told. There was no SSMS!
>
>A plain installation of SQL 2008 Express does not include SSMS. You
>need SQL 2008 Express with Advanced Services, as I recall.
Oh, is that what the difference is? (Well, I assume that is but
one of them.)
I thought I had installed a plain installation in the past and
gotten SSMS. Maybe, an SP did SSMS installation for me.
It is so hard to keep the versions straight. Two of the versions
that I have downloaded looked to be the same size so I checked them.
They were the same size and differed in only *four* bytes in over 100
MB. <boggle>
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-20 09:17 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA03B5E877C009Yazorman@127.0.0.1> |
| In reply to | #996 |
Gene Wirchenko (genew@ocis.net) writes: > On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:46:03 +0200, Erland Sommarskog ><esquel@sommarskog.se> wrote: >>A plain installation of SQL 2008 Express does not include SSMS. You >>need SQL 2008 Express with Advanced Services, as I recall. > > Oh, is that what the difference is? (Well, I assume that is but > one of them.) SQL Express only is the engine and the command-line tools. Advanced Services gives you quite a few more things. SSMS Express may also be a separate download. I don't know these details on the top of my head. > I thought I had installed a plain installation in the past and > gotten SSMS. Apparently you didn't. > Maybe, an SP did SSMS installation for me. If you installed the service pack for a download that includes SSMS, yes. -- Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se Links for SQL Server Books Online: SQL 2008: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sqlserver/cc514207.aspx SQL 2005: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sqlserver/bb895970.aspx
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-19 22:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <uds1p7te5h9c35q4ikn1qrh7vcsosefam3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #993 |
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:46:03 +0200, Erland Sommarskog
<esquel@sommarskog.se> wrote:
>Gene Wirchenko (genew@ocis.net) writes:
>> I installed SQL Server Express 2008 on it. I also installed SQL
>> Server Denali. The Denali installation ended up replacing my SSMS
>> with the Denali one. Because of some differences in the behaviour of
>> the SSMS, I wanted 2008's SSMS back.
>
>No, installing SQL 2012 does not replace SSMS 2008. I have both versions
I was specifically referring to Denali. It did overwrite (or at
least, override) SSMS 2008.
>installed my system. (However, naîvely accepting "do you want to transfer
>your settings for SSMS 2008 to SQL Server 2012, some of the settings
>were transferred in the other direction.) Mind you, this was developer
>edition, not Express, but I fail to see that should make a difference.
>
>> I then installed SQL Server 2008 Express. The installation was
>> successful. Well, that is what I was told. There was no SSMS!
>
>A plain installation of SQL 2008 Express does not include SSMS. You
>need SQL 2008 Express with Advanced Services, as I recall.
I just spent a couple hours trying to sort out the versions. I
think I got it, but complications did ensue.
I am running Windows 7 on my test box so I went with the 64-bit
versions. The files I settled on were:
SQLEXPRADV_x64_ENU.exe (version 10.00.1600.22)
SQLEXPR_x64_ENU.exe (version 10.00.5500.00) (SP3)
SQLManagementStudio_x64_ENU.exe
I was going to install them in that order.
The first one throws a compatibility error. On previous runs, I
have gotten two errors: 1) an error in the menu about an unhandled
exception and 2) near the end of the installation, I get:
Operation fialed with 0x8007000B
An attempt was made to load a program with an incorrect
format.
but the installation appears to succeed. (Whether it actually does, I
do not know. It does run.) I aborted on this file after getting the
compatibility error.
I installed SP3 and had no SSMS as you indicated.
I then installed the last program. It threw a compatibility
error, but I continued.
I now have a 64-bit SSE 2008 installation which apparently works,
but does it really?
Am I using the correct versions of files? Are there versions
that do not throw compatibility errors?
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-20 09:22 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA03B5F49F3A8DYazorman@127.0.0.1> |
| In reply to | #997 |
Gene Wirchenko (genew@ocis.net) writes: > I was specifically referring to Denali. It did overwrite (or at > least, override) SSMS 2008. Denali = SQL 2012. If you are referring to the CTPs... Betas are betas, but I have not heard of anyone having had the problem that the new SSMS occluded the other one. I am fairly confident that you did just not care to find it. > I just spent a couple hours trying to sort out the versions. I > think I got it, but complications did ensue. > > I am running Windows 7 on my test box so I went with the 64-bit > versions. The files I settled on were: > SQLEXPRADV_x64_ENU.exe (version 10.00.1600.22) > SQLEXPR_x64_ENU.exe (version 10.00.5500.00) (SP3) > SQLManagementStudio_x64_ENU.exe > I was going to install them in that order. > > The first one throws a compatibility error. Yes, that's the RTM version of SQL 2008 which was released before Windows 7 was released. You should be able to install it, but you need to apply a service pack to have a supported installation. -- Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se Links for SQL Server Books Online: SQL 2008: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sqlserver/cc514207.aspx SQL 2005: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sqlserver/bb895970.aspx
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-20 08:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <99v2p7hr9mcqg78b8tv6i8om2crmshoim0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #999 |
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:22:02 +0200, Erland Sommarskog
<esquel@sommarskog.se> wrote:
>Gene Wirchenko (genew@ocis.net) writes:
>> I was specifically referring to Denali. It did overwrite (or at
>> least, override) SSMS 2008.
>
>Denali = SQL 2012. If you are referring to the CTPs... Betas are betas,
>but I have not heard of anyone having had the problem that the new SSMS
>occluded the other one. I am fairly confident that you did just not care
>to find it.
Yes, CTP 1.
Now, you have.
I looked for it in the Start Menu. That is where it always had
been. All that was there after installing Denali was the Denali SSMS.
I could still connect to SSE 2008, but it was through Denali's SSMS.
>> I just spent a couple hours trying to sort out the versions. I
>> think I got it, but complications did ensue.
>>
>> I am running Windows 7 on my test box so I went with the 64-bit
>> versions. The files I settled on were:
>> SQLEXPRADV_x64_ENU.exe (version 10.00.1600.22)
>> SQLEXPR_x64_ENU.exe (version 10.00.5500.00) (SP3)
>> SQLManagementStudio_x64_ENU.exe
>> I was going to install them in that order.
>>
>> The first one throws a compatibility error.
>
>Yes, that's the RTM version of SQL 2008 which was released before
>Windows 7 was released. You should be able to install it, but you
>need to apply a service pack to have a supported installation.
But as I noted in text you snipped, SP 3 *also* threw a
compatibility error. I am concerned that I might not have a proper
SSE 2008 installation. Do I? I do so like to avoid error messages in
software installations.
Is there a 64-bit SSE 2008 that will install on Windows 7 without
throwing a compatibility error?
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-21 00:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA03C375FDBC6Yazorman@127.0.0.1> |
| In reply to | #1003 |
Gene Wirchenko (genew@ocis.net) writes: > But as I noted in text you snipped, SP 3 *also* threw a > compatibility error. I am concerned that I might not have a proper > SSE 2008 installation. Do I? I do so like to avoid error messages in > software installations. I missed that part. Anyway, I have SQL 2005, SQL 2008 and SQL 2012 running on my machine without problems. Whether they produced any compatibility when I installed them, I don't recall. They run well anyway. I don't see why SP3 should generate a compatibility error. But it may depend on which components you install. What more exactly did these errors say? -- Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se Links for SQL Server Books Online: SQL 2008: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sqlserver/cc514207.aspx SQL 2005: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sqlserver/bb895970.aspx
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.databases.ms-sqlserver
csiph-web