Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.databases.ms-access > #9062 > unrolled thread

Access 2013

Back to article view | Back to comp.databases.ms-access

Contents

  Access 2013 Stefano C <a@a.a> - 2014-02-25 19:24 +0100
    Re: Access 2013 "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2014-02-25 23:25 -0600

#9062 — Access 2013

Hi everybody,

Just a curiosity... still using Access 2010 -- mainly for backward 
compatibility (Windows XP & Vista).

Is Access 2013 worth the upgrade, in your opinion and experience? 
Consider that I don't really need Web Apps.

Stefano

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#9065

Considering that you don't need web apps, maybe you'd like to read this 
Microsoft document on features and functions _deleted_ from Access 2013 
"client".

http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/access-help/discontinued-features-and-modified-functionality-in-access-HA102749226.aspx

If I were creating individual, small workgroup, or client server database 
applications and didn't need web apps, I would hold out as long as I could, 
even under waterboarding, before I would agree to "upgrade" to Access 2013. 
You should realize that Microsoft's overriding focus is "everything in the 
cloud".

 -- 
 Larry Linson
  Microsoft Office Access MVP
  Co-Author, Microsoft Access Small Business Solutions, Wiley 2010

"Stefano C" <a@a.a> wrote in message 
news:530cdff8$0$1361$4fafbaef@reader1.news.tin.it...
> Hi everybody,
>
> Just a curiosity... still using Access 2010 -- mainly for backward 
> compatibility (Windows XP & Vista).
>
> Is Access 2013 worth the upgrade, in your opinion and experience? Consider 
> that I don't really need Web Apps.
>
> Stefano 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.databases.ms-access

csiph-web