Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.databases.ms-access > #9500
| From | BobAlston <bobalston9@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.databases.ms-access |
| Subject | Re: It's not possible to run an Access application using something like this, right? |
| Date | 2014-06-11 21:59 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <5399179D.60901@yahoo.com> (permalink) |
| References | <9507p91fjvuttj2k8ggcd2r57ve4uapgf6@4ax.com> <ur08p9tssgn5a47tt8l75kp00k9162c8gu@4ax.com> <fj4ip91k6a6812h540o0gvagq7e4hqes2t@4ax.com> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I support the idea of using Office 365's sharepoint capability to store your backend tables. P1 license is $6/month plus tax. All users can use this one license. You need to adjust your tables to meet sharepoint requirements. Then load the tables to sharepoint. Point your Access front end to the Sharepoint to get access to the data. This has worked well for me. bob On 6/11/2014 9:39 PM, PW wrote: > On Sun, 08 Jun 2014 01:40:33 -0500, Larry Linson > <larry.linson@verizon.net> wrote: > >> On Sat, 07 Jun 2014 15:18:05 -0600, PW >> <emailaddyinsig@ifIremember.com> wrote: >> >>> I wonder if Office 365 may work out. We certainly can't afford >>> to have our application rewritten in .NET, Alpha 5, ASP or >>> whatever. Not enough client base for that. And Sharepoint >>> would be a total rewrite. >> >> I can't speak to details of Office 365 (SharePoint is one of its >> components), but it's an option worth looking into. >> >> Another, if your clients are using Win 8, is to look into >> rewriting your application as an "app" that can be executed by >> all those devices. I don't like the idea of "turning my very >> capable PC into a cellphone" and that's essentially what you'll >> do with an "app". >> >> Larry Linson Microsoft Access MVP 2003 -2014 Co-author: >> "Microsoft Access Small Business Solutions" pub by Wiley, 2010 > > Interesting Larry! I guess for that I would try Alpha 5 but I > don't think I could rationalize the yearly cost of leasing the > software and starting over from scratch. > > -paulw > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTmRedAAoJEPGAQNtIEGcqdYEIAJ4UOxDgjBZiEe/5M2FSNHfl 80OG+2W+/nsWwzaXfXWmkiX1MxYABq56Vw6M6Bv/4HUZID59I01640ZSiIc/KDmy axp6aqrnRMkWM/I1nNjaw9l4ljH5E9mJ1VzUP0fY7Rm5dzU56+qZmRQ6JD7Hq2LI jOm6YoUvtStKY9UXUeR7COYlorGxZlPYLJ5FFU9TAsVWNOLVGJcE4GxH2PWmyiyK uYlGMdqErc9FMIDdlUNxyvkt8GYOvzslLxQdkiEgWA73fu8CXSRY6bvlT5jK4a2P V48/8IWbi8UcwPtWSdZ1Ycfbt/STfrnkk0JygxOdrGXXOrDJXhkrdKztfyInEWs= =eP7W -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Back to comp.databases.ms-access | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
It's not possible to run an Access application using something like this, right? PW <emailaddyinsig@ifIremember.com> - 2014-06-07 15:18 -0600
Re: It's not possible to run an Access application using something like this, right? Larry Linson <larry.linson@verizon.net> - 2014-06-08 01:40 -0500
Re: It's not possible to run an Access application using something like this, right? PW <emailaddyinsig@ifIremember.com> - 2014-06-11 20:39 -0600
Re: It's not possible to run an Access application using something like this, right? BobAlston <bobalston9@yahoo.com> - 2014-06-11 21:59 -0500
Re: It's not possible to run an Access application using something like this, right? Larry Linson <larry.linson@verizon.net> - 2014-06-11 23:56 -0500
Re: It's not possible to run an Access application using something like this, right? BobAlston <bobalston9@yahoo.com> - 2014-06-12 08:49 -0500
csiph-web