Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.compression > #2192 > unrolled thread

speech codec

Back to article view | Back to comp.compression

Contents

  speech codec Nimo <azeez541@gmail.com> - 2014-01-12 23:22 -0800
    Re: speech codec sg <sgesemann@gmail.invalid> - 2014-01-13 19:44 +0100
      Re: speech codec Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-01-17 14:20 +0200
    speech codec Nimo <azeez541@gmail.com> - 2014-01-14 01:32 -0800

#2192 — speech codec

Hi there,
I'm back after a very long time..
completed the Theory (paper work) for a new speech codec,
trying to implement its practical implementation (computer application), can any one pls advise me..
1. what things I have to take into consideration
while developing the codec.
2. what speex www.speex.org offers at 2.5kbps my codec offers the same at 200  bits with out loosing the fidelity.
3. I can get ultra wideband 32khz sound at just 200-250 bits with out missing sweetness of the sound.

      Any doubts or ideas., I am always here to help you.

so long,
  Nimo.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#2193

Am 13.01.2014 08:22, schrieb Nimo:
> Hi there,
> I'm back after a very long time..
> completed the Theory (paper work) for a new speech codec,
> trying to implement its practical implementation (computer application), can any one pls advise me..
> 1. what things I have to take into consideration
> while developing the codec.
> 2. what speex www.speex.org offers at 2.5kbps my codec offers the same at 200  bits with out loosing the fidelity.
> 3. I can get ultra wideband 32khz sound at just 200-250 bits with out missing sweetness of the sound.
> 
>       Any doubts or ideas., I am always here to help you.
> 
> so long,
>   Nimo.

Make up your mind. Do you want help or not?
Have you implemented your ideas or not?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2196

sg <sgesemann@gmail.invalid> writes:
> Am 13.01.2014 08:22, schrieb Nimo:
> > Hi there,
> > I'm back after a very long time..
> > completed the Theory (paper work) for a new speech codec,
> > trying to implement its practical implementation (computer application), can any one pls advise me..
> > 1. what things I have to take into consideration
> > while developing the codec.
> > 2. what speex www.speex.org offers at 2.5kbps my codec offers the same at 200  bits with out loosing the fidelity.
> > 3. I can get ultra wideband 32khz sound at just 200-250 bits with out missing sweetness of the sound.

So in 0-50 bits you can add an entire orchestration to somebody narrating something?

And how many bits are required to encode two people talking over each other?

And heaven forfend that anyone would put an orchestration behind two such
vocal lines. Wow - Bat out of Hell has just disappeared from my CD shelf,
and presumably it never even existed in the first place!

> >       Any doubts or ideas., I am always here to help you.
> > 
> > so long,
> >   Nimo.
> 
> Make up your mind. Do you want help or not?
> Have you implemented your ideas or not?

Guessing not. 

Guessing loon.

Phil
-- 
The list of trusted root authorities in your browser included the
United Arab Emirates-based Etisalat, which was caught secretly
uploading spyware onto 100,000 customers' BlackBerries.
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/07/blackberry-spies/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2194

Thomas any ideas from u r side..

   cheers,
     nimo.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.compression

csiph-web