Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compression > #1694
| From | glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compression |
| Subject | Re: Question about compression with conditions |
| Date | 2013-01-19 18:59 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <kdeqfc$cob$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <50fa7853$0$1369$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <aKydnVMNt5WzKmfNRVn_vwA@giganews.com> |
John Reiser <jreiserfl@comcast.net> wrote: >> As an example, let's imagine I have chunks of 128 bytes, that is to say 1024 bits. >> In these chunks I always have at least 522 bits to "1" (and it can go up to 532 bits). > The number of distinct allowed chunks is C(1024,522) + C(1024,523) + ... + C(1024,532) > where C(n,k) is the number of combinations of n things (bits) taken k at a time (the > '1' bits). The sum is a small fraction of 2**1024, which is the number of all subsets > of the 1024 bits. Therefore: logically enumerate the allowed chunks into a single > ordered list. Encode any particular allowed chunk as its position in the list. > For a sequence of chunks, the corresponding sequence of position ordinals > may be compressed further using ordinary techniques based on entropy. Is it really that small? I was trying to guesstimate it, but I didn't come up with anything. My thought was that it wasn't quite as small as you might hope. If you compute the logs of the factorials, it might be easier. -- glen
Back to comp.compression | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Question about compression with conditions "peter.c" <peter.c@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-19 11:41 +0100
Re: Question about compression with conditions John Reiser <jreiserfl@comcast.net> - 2013-01-19 07:10 -0800
Re: Question about compression with conditions "peter.c" <peter.c@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-19 19:08 +0100
Re: Question about compression with conditions glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-01-19 18:59 +0000
Re: Question about compression with conditions John Reiser <jreiserfl@comcast.net> - 2013-01-19 13:15 -0800
Re: Question about compression with conditions glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-01-19 22:41 +0000
Re: Question about compression with conditions "peter.c" <peter.c@invalid.invalid> - 2013-01-19 23:23 +0100
csiph-web