Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compression > #1161
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | lawcounsels@gmail.com |
| Newsgroups | comp.compression |
| Subject | Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments |
| Date | Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:23:23 -0700 (PDT) |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Lines | 72 |
| Message-ID | <22715445.146.1331817803942.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbnd9> (permalink) |
| References | <65477e30-7acd-4b01-acb0-81562834eff1@w5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <jjn34b$nth$1@news.belwue.de> <83e630a6-055d-4b19-a254-e68b27bc687d@hv2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <jjo3ff$o79$1@news.belwue.de> <6b44786e-f24a-4d7a-a997-0fc1fd5b540f@v2g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> <jjo7oe$2lf$1@news.belwue.de> <15058176.7153.1331714613969.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbkc1> <282577.342.1331714779099.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbgx21> <jjpu9g$jsj$1@news.belwue.de> <deb3b3b3-e16e-4864-bac7-8b4a23e260eb@b18g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <16243911.3179.1331750063166.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbmf37> <jjr1s0$q00$1@news.belwue.de> <2526975.5120.1331792978162.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbue17> <jjsins$3bb$1@news.belwue.de> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 78.146.210.243 |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| X-Trace | posting.google.com 1331817902 13969 127.0.0.1 (15 Mar 2012 13:25:02 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:25:02 +0000 (UTC) |
| In-Reply-To | <jjsins$3bb$1@news.belwue.de> |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=78.146.210.243; posting-account=cGF1rQoAAABOnAs5fPWyF_6BYwGJCASn |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.compression:1161 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Thursday, March 15, 2012 11:10:51 AM UTC, Thomas Richter wrote: > On 15.03.2012 07:29, lawcounsels@gmail.com wrote: > > >> So this is not exactly "interesting". The answer is immediate, and > >> exactly what is expected. > >> > >> More interesting things happen if you map this to a smaller set, say, > >> you consider for example sums of random variables. Then, under mild > >> constraints of the source, you get something called the "central limit > >> theorem", i.e. your distribution approaches Gaussians (or stable > >> distributions under less constrained conditions). > >> > >> Greetings, > >> Thomas > > > > we are both on the right wavelengths here > > > > myself would 100 times out of 100 immediate says the exact same you did here without hesitations ... EXCEPT the INVARIABLE REVERSIBLE resultant transformed file of same N bits long ALWAYS GIVES sizeable portions with unmistakable particularly strong patterns / restrictions ( UNMISTAKABLY UNAMBIGUOUS LOW ENTROPY bits sequences at unmistakable unambiguous ascertainable 'start' / 'end' bits positions .... mathematics proven instantiated with the described Entropy Definition formula on ALL real transformed resultant files ) > > Look, what people often confuse is "has many obvious patterns" = "has > low entropy". This is simply wrong. A specific outcome of a random > source may very well have "obvious patterns", but might still have a low > probability. > > For example, let Y be a binary random iid source with p(0)=7/8 and > p(1)=1/8. Let z_k be the n-th digit in the binary expansion of Pi, or to > be precise, let z_k = floor(\pi * 2^k) mod 2. Then define x_k = y^k xor > z_k. Then, the outcome (realization) of z_k being 0000...000000 is > surely very unlikely, yet has an obvious pattern, and the entropy of Y > and the entropy of X are identical. (And the entropy of Z is zero > because it is not a random process...). > > This "paradox" stems from the fact that sources humans like you or me > care about only care about reduntant sources, i.e. the random sources we > look at (newspapers, photos, audio recordings) are highly redundant > *and* contain many patterns. That is, for the sources we care about, we > have "low entropy" = "many patterns". But this is simply false in > general. Or to be even more concrete "having a pattern" is not a > well-defined term, nor does it have any relation to entropy. It *only* > (or should I write "only"?) has a relation to entropy for those sources > we as human observers care about. Sources with patterns allow "simple > models", but just because the models are simpler that allow you to > consider them as low-entropy random sources does not mean that there are > low-entropy sources that do not show obvious patterns. In fact, in a > precise way, *most* low-order entropy sources are like that (i.e. do not > show obvious patterns). Unfortunately, even these "most low order > entropy sources" (with non-obvious patterns) are still a very rare > species in the set of all sources, rare enough to disallow any escape > from the counting argument. > > So long, > Thomas these are different, the strong patterns here mathematics proven instantiated with the described Entropy Definition formula on ALL real transformed resultant files )
Back to comp.compression | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Entropy Definition : Request for Comments LawCounsels <LawCounsels@aol.com> - 2012-03-13 01:40 -0700
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-03-13 10:13 +0100
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 10:03 -0700
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-03-13 19:25 +0100
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 11:56 -0700
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-03-13 20:38 +0100
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-03-14 01:43 -0700
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-03-14 01:46 -0700
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-03-14 12:09 +0100
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments LawCounsels <LawCounsels@aol.com> - 2012-03-14 08:52 -0700
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-03-14 11:34 -0700
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-03-14 22:16 +0100
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-03-14 23:29 -0700
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-03-15 12:10 +0100
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-03-15 06:23 -0700
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-03-15 16:45 +0100
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments LawCounsels <LawCounsels@aol.com> - 2012-03-20 18:08 -0700
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-03-14 22:10 +0100
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments jacko <jackokring@gmail.com> - 2012-03-15 16:27 -0700
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments jacko <jackokring@gmail.com> - 2012-03-15 16:40 -0700
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments jacko <jackokring@gmail.com> - 2012-03-15 17:14 -0700
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments jacko <jackokring@gmail.com> - 2012-03-15 17:24 -0700
Re: Entropy Definition : Request for Comments LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-03-31 10:30 -0700
csiph-web