Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #2517 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Lasse Hillerøe Petersen <lhp+news@toft-hp.dk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-05-12 07:20 +0000 |
| Last post | 2020-05-12 07:20 +0000 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.compilers
ECMAScript grammar notation Lasse Hillerøe Petersen <lhp+news@toft-hp.dk> - 2020-05-12 07:20 +0000
| From | Lasse Hillerøe Petersen <lhp+news@toft-hp.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-05-12 07:20 +0000 |
| Subject | ECMAScript grammar notation |
| Message-ID | <20-05-004@comp.compilers> |
I just looked at https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-notational-conventions and noticed that they have been using an extended grammar notation (based on the one used by K&R in The C Programming Language) for some years now. It's not quite a VW-grammar yet, but I presume they introduced it because the language now has so many weird corners, where a general version of a production cannot be used without causing problems. Productions can be parametrized with [Word1,Word2,...], such that a rule Nonterminal[Alfa,Beta] is defines three rules, for Nonterminal, Nonterminal_Alfa and Nonterminal_Beta. RHS Nonterminals can be parametrized in various ways as well. NT[+Alfa], NT[~Alfa], NT[?Alfa] with various meanings. Are there any parser generators out there that support these "features"? /Lasse
Back to top | Article view | comp.compilers
csiph-web