Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.compilers > #2097 > unrolled thread

Re: Compiler implementation language preference ?

Back to article view | Back to comp.compilers

Contents

  Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? Bruce Mardle <marblypup@yahoo.co.uk> - 2018-05-23 07:33 -0700

#2097 — Re: Compiler implementation language preference ?

On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 18:39:07 UTC+1, Michael Justice  wrote:
> Is there any preference to writing a compiler in say c instead of say
> java, fortran, basic etc? I ask cause i see many of the projects using
> either c or c++ instead of other programming languages.

> [Mostly people use what they're used to, or in languages that are easy
> to bootstrap on the machines they want to use.  IBM's Fortran H
> compiler was famously written in itself, but I wouldn't write a new
> compiler in Fortran because it doesn't have great data structuring or
> dynamic storage management.  (Yes, I know that Fortran 2008 is a lot
> different from Fortran 66.) -John]

Per John's remark, the last translator I wrote (a Z280
cross-assembler) was in C (and bison) principally because that's what
I usually write in!  In the early '80s I wrote 2 translatory things in
ZX Spectrum Basic. (The Speccy was the only computer I had access to.)
About 1,000 lines each. Later, I translated 1 in Mallard Basic and the
other into Turbo Pascal, both on an Amstrad PCW. The translation from
Spectrum Basic to Mallard Basic was a lot harder than the translation
to Pascal, which may explain my dim view of Basic!

I bet some of my old (later) Spectrum C programs would still compile... though
I'd probably have to turn off lots of warnings!
I've learnt a few new programming languages in the past 17 years but, in my
dotage, I've mostly forgotten them again :-/

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.compilers

csiph-web