Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.compilers > #2073 > unrolled thread

Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format

Started byMartin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk>
First post2018-04-13 13:35 +0100
Last post2018-04-13 13:35 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.compilers

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2018-04-13 13:35 +0100

#2073 — Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format

FromMartin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk>
Date2018-04-13 13:35 +0100
SubjectRe: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format
Message-ID<18-04-058@comp.compilers>
On 12/04/18 12:15, bartc wrote:
> I'm not saying it's not practical with C, but the language makes it harder.

I think you just summed up C in a single sentence! Congratulations :-)

--
			Martin

Dr Martin Ward | Email: martin@gkc.org.uk | http://www.gkc.org.uk
G.K.Chesterton site: http://www.gkc.org.uk/gkc | Erdos number: 4

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.compilers


csiph-web