Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.compilers > #2038 > unrolled thread

Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format

Back to article view | Back to comp.compilers

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Nick Maclaren" <nmm@wheeler.UUCP> - 2018-04-09 15:05 +0000

#2038 — Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format

 [[ this string is copied from comp.arch because your moderation found it interesting ]]

In article <d315af03-75ee-4b7f-827d-4d8d3a7ae2c1@googlegroups.com>,
MitchAlsup  <MitchAlsup@netscape.net> wrote:
>On Monday, April 9, 2018 at 6:30:35 AM UTC-5, Walter Banks wrote:
>>
>> GCC tools are for the most part using old compiler technology. Some of
>> is decades old.
>
>But has there been any real advances since Oho and Ullman came out?

Yes.  But that doesn't mean that it has superseded all of the older
approaches.  Unless there is a problem with the technologies, there
is no reason to condemn their use.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.compilers

csiph-web