Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #936 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-07-01 21:36 +0200 |
| Last post | 2013-07-01 21:36 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.compilers
SSA conversion and closure conversion Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2013-07-01 21:36 +0200
| From | Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-01 21:36 +0200 |
| Subject | SSA conversion and closure conversion |
| Message-ID | <13-07-005@comp.compilers> |
I'm trying to implement some program analysis (exact goals are still a bit foggy) for a programming language which has mutable local variables and closures. I want to convert things to SSA form because I'm mostly interested in properties which could be easily extracted in that representation, I think. I see three ways to deal with closed-over variables: perform closure conversion first (and something like scalar replacement later, to recover information on closed-over variables), perform SSA conversion and insert phi nodes after instructions which potentially call a closure, or somehow combine closure conversion and SSA conversion. Surely this has come up before, and I'm wondering which option is best or if I'm missing some approach.
Back to top | Article view | comp.compilers
csiph-web