Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.compilers > #208 > unrolled thread

Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design.

Started byMichael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
First post2011-07-19 16:16 -0700
Last post2011-07-19 16:16 -0700
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.compilers

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-19 16:16 -0700

#208 — Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design.

FromMichael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Date2011-07-19 16:16 -0700
SubjectRe: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design.
Message-ID<11-07-032@comp.compilers>
On Jul 15, 1:57 am, Andrew Reilly <areilly...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:37:53 -0400, Roberto Waltman wrote:
> > Recently I've become (very) interested in Wirth's Lilith/Modula-2
> > workstation, which leads me to ask:
>
> > What other systems were developed in a similar fashion?
>
> > That is, to support mainly one language with the language guiding the
> > architectural design.
>
> Bit of a stretch, perhaps: the AS-400 series of minis vs ?Cobol? ?PL/1?
>

RPG.
Never touched AS/400 myself. From what I heard from friends back in
early 90s, RPG was considered the HLL of choice on this machines.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.compilers


csiph-web