Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.compilers > #1676

Re: antlr

From George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net>
Newsgroups comp.compilers
Subject Re: antlr
Date 2016-03-15 10:53 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <16-03-004@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References <16-03-001@comp.compilers>

Show all headers | View raw


On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 05:01:01 -0400, ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com>
wrote:

>anyone using antlr?  I'm taking compiler theory for my masters and they
>are using in with Java in intellij... and I find it a bit difficult to
>get around the IDE.

The IDE is not Antlr - it is IntelliJ with a plug-in that interfaces
to the separate[*] Antlr tool.  I've never used IntelliJ so I can't
help you with that.

I have used Antlr via command line, through makefiles, and via
external tool options in a few other IDEs.  I haven't used the current
version (4.x), but I have projects based on earlier versions.


[*] Antlr is installed along with the plug-in, but it is separate.


>[There is a newsgroup comp.compilers.tools.pccts but it's been a long time
>since it's seen any traffic. -John]

Yes.  There's some discussion of old versions of Antlr.  PCCTS itself
was a earlier tool from the same author (Terence Parr).  Antlr began
as a more powerful version of PCCTS.

Antlr now is supported mainly on Stackoverflow.com and via a Google
group.  see http://www.antlr.org/support.html


But that won't help with the IntelliJ issue.  If it's hard to use,
that's the fault of the plug-in (or the platform).

George

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

antlr ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2016-03-13 05:01 -0400
  Re: antlr George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2016-03-15 10:53 -0400
    Re: antlr ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2016-03-22 23:54 -0400
      Re: antlr George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2016-03-23 02:56 -0400

csiph-web