Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #1396
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED!nerds-end |
|---|---|
| From | Ivan Godard <ivan@ootbcomp.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: A Plain English Compiler |
| Date | Mon, 27 Oct 2014 15:07:23 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 15 |
| Sender | news@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <14-10-011@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <06-02-122@comp.compilers> <06-02-125@comp.compilers> <14-10-005@comp.compilers> <14-10-008@comp.compilers> <14-10-009@comp.compilers> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | news.iecc.com |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Trace | miucha.iecc.com 1414517241 80655 2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970 (28 Oct 2014 17:27:21 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@iecc.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 28 Oct 2014 17:27:21 +0000 (UTC) |
| Keywords | Cobol |
| Posted-Date | 28 Oct 2014 13:27:21 EDT |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.compilers:1396 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 10/27/2014 12:25 PM, Kartik Agaram wrote: >> John said (back in 2006) "You can certainly chop English down to >> a small unambiguous subset, but then you've just reinvented Cobol" > [COBOL has an undeserved poor reputation largely among people who've > never used it. Yes, it's wordy, deliberately so, and its facilities > for control structure are weak by modern standards, but it invented > the structured data we now take for granted in languages like C and > C++ and has a wider range of datatypes than most of its successors. > For its time and its intended application it was a huge success. > -John] Agreed. COBOL is the Rodney Dangerfield of languages; it don't get no respect. It's really organized around name/value pairs (think MOVE CORRESPONDING), but with a much nicer syntax than raw XML.
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: A Plain English Compiler gerry.rzeppa@pobox.com - 2014-10-24 16:33 -0700
Re: A Plain English Compiler lesliedellow@gmail.com - 2014-10-25 06:01 -0700
Re: A Plain English Compiler "Derek M. Jones" <derek@knosof.co.uk> - 2014-10-25 19:51 +0100
Re: A Plain English Compiler "Gerry Rzeppa" <gerry.rzeppa@pobox.com> - 2014-10-30 14:53 -0500
Re: A Plain English Compiler Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2014-10-27 11:54 +0000
Re: A Plain English Compiler Kartik Agaram <ak@akkartik.com> - 2014-10-27 12:25 -0700
Re: A Plain English Compiler Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-10-27 21:45 +0000
Re: reading and writing, was A Plain English Compiler Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2014-10-28 17:37 -0400
Re: A Plain English Compiler Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2014-10-29 01:28 +0100
Fw: A Plain English Compiler "Gerry Rzeppa" <gerry.rzeppa@pobox.com> - 2014-10-30 04:02 -0500
Re: A Plain English Compiler mac <acolvin@efunct.com> - 2014-11-03 13:15 +0000
Re: A Plain English Compiler Ivan Godard <ivan@ootbcomp.com> - 2014-10-27 15:07 -0700
Re: A Plain English Compiler Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2014-10-28 15:14 +0000
Re: A Plain English Compiler Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2014-10-28 17:33 -0400
Re: A Plain English Compiler "Gerry Rzeppa" <gerry.rzeppa@pobox.com> - 2014-10-30 17:05 -0500
Re: A Plain English Compiler "Gerry Rzeppa" <gerry.rzeppa@pobox.com> - 2014-10-31 01:05 -0500
Re: A Plain English Compiler "Gerry Rzeppa" <gerry.rzeppa@pobox.com> - 2014-10-31 21:22 -0500
Fw: A Plain English Compiler "Gerry Rzeppa" <gerry.rzeppa@pobox.com> - 2014-10-30 04:01 -0500
csiph-web