Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.compilers > #1378

Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha)

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED!nerds-end
From Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk>
Newsgroups comp.compilers
Subject Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha)
Date Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:16:28 +0100
Organization Compilers Central
Lines 16
Sender news@iecc.com
Approved comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID <14-09-012@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References <14-09-005@comp.compilers> <14-09-007@comp.compilers> <14-09-010@comp.compilers>
NNTP-Posting-Host news.iecc.com
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Trace miucha.iecc.com 1410728501 6473 2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970 (14 Sep 2014 21:01:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To abuse@iecc.com
NNTP-Posting-Date Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:01:41 +0000 (UTC)
Keywords OOP, history
Posted-Date 14 Sep 2014 17:01:41 EDT
X-submission-address compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives http://compilers.iecc.com
Xref csiph.com comp.compilers:1378

Show key headers only | View raw


On 10/09/14 17:14, Anton Ertl wrote:
> the original object-oriented languages are all imperative

Simula, which dates from around 1962, is probably the original
object-oriented language, and is imperative. But Smalltalk,
for which development started in 1969, was a very early functional
object-oriented language.

--
			Martin

Dr Martin Ward STRL Principal Lecturer & Reader in Software Engineering
martin@gkc.org.uk  http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~mward/  Erdos number: 4
G.K.Chesterton web site: http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~mward/gkc/
Mirrors:  http://www.gkc.org.uk  and  http://www.gkc.org.uk/gkc

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha) Boris Burshteyn <bburshteyn@amsdec.com> - 2014-09-09 12:38 -0700
  Re: Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha) glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-10 01:48 +0000
    Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha) Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-09-10 04:58 +0000
    Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha) Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2014-09-10 09:44 +0100
    Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-10 16:14 +0000
      Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha) Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2014-09-11 13:16 +0100
        Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-15 08:07 +0000

csiph-web