Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #1375
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED!nerds-end |
|---|---|
| From | Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha) |
| Date | Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:44:24 +0100 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Lines | 16 |
| Sender | news@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <14-09-009@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <14-09-005@comp.compilers> <14-09-007@comp.compilers> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970 |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Trace | miucha.iecc.com 1410361411 52873 2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970 (10 Sep 2014 15:03:31 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@iecc.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:03:31 +0000 (UTC) |
| Keywords | OOP, design |
| Posted-Date | 10 Sep 2014 11:03:30 EDT |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.compilers:1375 |
Show key headers only | View raw
> [I've always thought of OOP as being orthogonal to imperative, > declarative, or functional. But I'm not sure how much it matters. > Are there any functional OOP languages? -John] Common Lisp has the Common Lisp Object System (CLOS) for object-oriented programming. Scheme has Tiny-CLOS. It is possible to program in an object oriented style in Haskell: http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/OOP_vs_type_classes -- Martin Dr Martin Ward STRL Principal Lecturer & Reader in Software Engineering martin@gkc.org.uk http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~mward/ Erdos number: 4 G.K.Chesterton web site: http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~mward/gkc/ Mirrors: http://www.gkc.org.uk and http://www.gkc.org.uk/gkc
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha) Boris Burshteyn <bburshteyn@amsdec.com> - 2014-09-09 12:38 -0700
Re: Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha) glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-10 01:48 +0000
Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha) Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-09-10 04:58 +0000
Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha) Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2014-09-10 09:44 +0100
Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-10 16:14 +0000
Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha) Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2014-09-11 13:16 +0100
Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-15 08:07 +0000
csiph-web