Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #1220
| From | Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: NFA with non-deterministic outputs |
| Date | 2014-04-14 04:34 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <14-04-013@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <14-04-004@comp.compilers> <14-04-010@comp.compilers> |
On 2014-04-13, federation2005@netzero.com <federation2005@netzero.com> wrote: > So, no. NFA's are not the appropriate model to use here. Rather, one would use > a non-deterministic FSM (finite state machine). "FA" stands for "finite automaton", which is a synonym of FSM, "finite state machine". There is no difference between "NFA" and "non-deterministic FSM".
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
NFA with non-deterministic outputs wyse03br@gmail.com - 2014-04-07 12:17 -0700
Re: NFA with non-deterministic outputs George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2014-04-08 17:37 -0400
Re: NFA with non-deterministic outputs federation2005@netzero.com - 2014-04-13 11:51 -0700
Re: NFA with non-deterministic outputs Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-04-14 04:34 +0000
Re: NFA with non-deterministic outputs wyse03br@gmail.com - 2014-09-09 14:26 -0700
Re: NFA with non-deterministic outputs federation2005@netzero.com - 2014-10-20 15:18 -0700
csiph-web