Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.compilers > #1090

Re: Safe Pointers at the Intermediate Language or Hardware Level

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED!nerds-end
From wclodius@earthlink.net (William Clodius)
Newsgroups comp.compilers
Subject Re: Safe Pointers at the Intermediate Language or Hardware Level
Date Mon, 10 Feb 2014 23:03:36 -0700
Organization Compilers Central
Lines 32
Sender news@iecc.com
Approved comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID <14-02-011@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References <14-02-007@comp.compilers>
NNTP-Posting-Host news.iecc.com
X-Trace miucha.iecc.com 1392101553 74091 64.57.183.58 (11 Feb 2014 06:52:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To abuse@iecc.com
NNTP-Posting-Date Tue, 11 Feb 2014 06:52:33 +0000 (UTC)
Keywords architecture, debug
Posted-Date 11 Feb 2014 01:52:32 EST
X-submission-address compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives http://compilers.iecc.com
X-Received-Bytes 2138
X-Received-Body-CRC 3175214468
Xref csiph.com comp.compilers:1090

Show key headers only | View raw


<seimarao@gmail.com> wrote:

>     Its been a long time since Java & .Net introduced safe address
>     types to the computing world.
>
>     My question is have we settled on what could be a proper representation
>     for safe pointers ?
>
>     Some Mainframes like the 390 have historically supported safe pointers,
>     I remember.
>
> Sincerely,
> Seima Rao.
> [I looked at my S/390 Principles of Operation, and I see a bunch of stuff
> for tracing, but nothing that looks like safe pointers.  I'd think it was
> hardware dependent, e.g., if a machine has a fairly clean and efficient
> trap for an unmapped zero address, you'd use that, but if it doesn't, you'd
> do something else. -John]

To me it sounds like they are interested either in capabaility
architectures

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capability-based_security>

or something similar to dope vectors

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dope_vector

for something like Algol 60/68, APL, Matlab, or Fortran 90+. Dope
vectors can in principle be used for scalars as well as arrays, as a
software substitute for a capability architecture, but most users
would dislike the overhead.

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Safe Pointers at the Intermediate Language or Hardware Level seimarao@gmail.com - 2014-02-10 09:11 -0800
  Re: Safe Pointers at the Intermediate Language or Hardware Level flaps@dgp.toronto.edu (Alan J Rosenthal) - 2014-02-11 00:58 +0000
  Re: Safe Pointers at the Intermediate Language or Hardware Level glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-02-11 01:03 +0000
  Re: Safe Pointers at the Intermediate Language or Hardware Level Ivan Godard <ivan@ootbcomp.com> - 2014-02-10 20:45 -0800
  Re: Safe Pointers at the Intermediate Language or Hardware Level wclodius@earthlink.net (William Clodius) - 2014-02-10 23:03 -0700

csiph-web