Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #1090
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED!nerds-end |
|---|---|
| From | wclodius@earthlink.net (William Clodius) |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Safe Pointers at the Intermediate Language or Hardware Level |
| Date | Mon, 10 Feb 2014 23:03:36 -0700 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Lines | 32 |
| Sender | news@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <14-02-011@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <14-02-007@comp.compilers> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | news.iecc.com |
| X-Trace | miucha.iecc.com 1392101553 74091 64.57.183.58 (11 Feb 2014 06:52:33 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@iecc.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 11 Feb 2014 06:52:33 +0000 (UTC) |
| Keywords | architecture, debug |
| Posted-Date | 11 Feb 2014 01:52:32 EST |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
| X-Received-Bytes | 2138 |
| X-Received-Body-CRC | 3175214468 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.compilers:1090 |
Show key headers only | View raw
<seimarao@gmail.com> wrote: > Its been a long time since Java & .Net introduced safe address > types to the computing world. > > My question is have we settled on what could be a proper representation > for safe pointers ? > > Some Mainframes like the 390 have historically supported safe pointers, > I remember. > > Sincerely, > Seima Rao. > [I looked at my S/390 Principles of Operation, and I see a bunch of stuff > for tracing, but nothing that looks like safe pointers. I'd think it was > hardware dependent, e.g., if a machine has a fairly clean and efficient > trap for an unmapped zero address, you'd use that, but if it doesn't, you'd > do something else. -John] To me it sounds like they are interested either in capabaility architectures <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capability-based_security> or something similar to dope vectors http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dope_vector for something like Algol 60/68, APL, Matlab, or Fortran 90+. Dope vectors can in principle be used for scalars as well as arrays, as a software substitute for a capability architecture, but most users would dislike the overhead.
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Safe Pointers at the Intermediate Language or Hardware Level seimarao@gmail.com - 2014-02-10 09:11 -0800 Re: Safe Pointers at the Intermediate Language or Hardware Level flaps@dgp.toronto.edu (Alan J Rosenthal) - 2014-02-11 00:58 +0000 Re: Safe Pointers at the Intermediate Language or Hardware Level glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-02-11 01:03 +0000 Re: Safe Pointers at the Intermediate Language or Hardware Level Ivan Godard <ivan@ootbcomp.com> - 2014-02-10 20:45 -0800 Re: Safe Pointers at the Intermediate Language or Hardware Level wclodius@earthlink.net (William Clodius) - 2014-02-10 23:03 -0700
csiph-web