Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.compilers > #1077

Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design)

X-Received by 10.58.23.137 with SMTP id m9mr4324717vef.13.1389384035429; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:00:35 -0800 (PST)
Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!6no2777264qao.1!news-out.google.com!l9ni13732qay.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED!nerds-end
From Ivan Godard <ivan@ootbcomp.com>
Newsgroups comp.compilers
Subject Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design)
Date Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:11:04 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 26
Sender johnl@iecc.com
Approved comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID <14-01-010@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References <13-11-025@comp.compilers> <14-01-007@comp.compilers> <14-01-008@comp.compilers>
NNTP-Posting-Host lnews.iecc.com
Mime-Version 1.0
X-Trace leila.iecc.com 1389384034 58584 64.57.183.51 (10 Jan 2014 20:00:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To abuse@iecc.com
NNTP-Posting-Date Fri, 10 Jan 2014 20:00:34 +0000 (UTC)
Keywords arithmetic, standards
Posted-Date 10 Jan 2014 15:00:33 EST
X-submission-address compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives http://compilers.iecc.com
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Xref csiph.com comp.compilers:1077

Show key headers only | View raw


On 1/8/2014 10:21 AM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> On 2014-01-08, Ivan Godard <ivan@ootbcomp.com> wrote:
>> On 11/20/2013 2:29 AM, Martin Ward wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> (2) CPU designers may choose to implement that behaviour in hardware
>>> on the next iteration of the CPU. Now the programs run fast on *all*
>>> CPUs.
>>>
>>> Everybody wins.
>>
>> I am such a CPU designer. We faced the "undefined" issue in our Mill
>> family of general-purpose CPUs (ootbcomp.com). Not only are languages
>> under-constraining, they are also sometimes over-constraining: signed
>> integer overflow is undefined in C but required to wrap in Java.
>
> It's only undefined on paper. In reality, if you don't make it wrap in C like
> in Java, unknown numbers of C programs will break, and not all of them doing it
> by accident.

Or one may say that unknown numbers of C programs are already broken.

And the reality is that the program cannot even in practice depend on
wrapping; see http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/120, or just Google
"signed integer overflow in C".

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2013-11-20 10:29 +0000
  Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.net> - 2013-11-23 01:06 -0600
    Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-11-24 21:51 +0000
    Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2014-01-06 19:23 +0000
  Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2013-12-17 23:07 +0000
    Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2014-01-06 19:32 +0000
  Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) Ivan Godard <ivan@ootbcomp.com> - 2014-01-08 09:02 -0800
    Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-01-08 18:21 +0000
      Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) Ivan Godard <ivan@ootbcomp.com> - 2014-01-10 09:11 -0800
      Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-01-10 23:08 +0000
        Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) Ivan Godard <ivan@ootbcomp.com> - 2014-01-13 12:47 -0800
        Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-01-14 14:16 +0000

csiph-web