Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #1077
| X-Received | by 10.58.23.137 with SMTP id m9mr4324717vef.13.1389384035429; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:00:35 -0800 (PST) |
|---|---|
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!6no2777264qao.1!news-out.google.com!l9ni13732qay.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED!nerds-end |
| From | Ivan Godard <ivan@ootbcomp.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) |
| Date | Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:11:04 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 26 |
| Sender | johnl@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <14-01-010@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <13-11-025@comp.compilers> <14-01-007@comp.compilers> <14-01-008@comp.compilers> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | lnews.iecc.com |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| X-Trace | leila.iecc.com 1389384034 58584 64.57.183.51 (10 Jan 2014 20:00:34 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@iecc.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Fri, 10 Jan 2014 20:00:34 +0000 (UTC) |
| Keywords | arithmetic, standards |
| Posted-Date | 10 Jan 2014 15:00:33 EST |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.compilers:1077 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 1/8/2014 10:21 AM, Kaz Kylheku wrote: > On 2014-01-08, Ivan Godard <ivan@ootbcomp.com> wrote: >> On 11/20/2013 2:29 AM, Martin Ward wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >>> (2) CPU designers may choose to implement that behaviour in hardware >>> on the next iteration of the CPU. Now the programs run fast on *all* >>> CPUs. >>> >>> Everybody wins. >> >> I am such a CPU designer. We faced the "undefined" issue in our Mill >> family of general-purpose CPUs (ootbcomp.com). Not only are languages >> under-constraining, they are also sometimes over-constraining: signed >> integer overflow is undefined in C but required to wrap in Java. > > It's only undefined on paper. In reality, if you don't make it wrap in C like > in Java, unknown numbers of C programs will break, and not all of them doing it > by accident. Or one may say that unknown numbers of C programs are already broken. And the reality is that the program cannot even in practice depend on wrapping; see http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/120, or just Google "signed integer overflow in C".
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2013-11-20 10:29 +0000
Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.net> - 2013-11-23 01:06 -0600
Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-11-24 21:51 +0000
Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2014-01-06 19:23 +0000
Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2013-12-17 23:07 +0000
Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2014-01-06 19:32 +0000
Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) Ivan Godard <ivan@ootbcomp.com> - 2014-01-08 09:02 -0800
Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-01-08 18:21 +0000
Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) Ivan Godard <ivan@ootbcomp.com> - 2014-01-10 09:11 -0800
Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-01-10 23:08 +0000
Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) Ivan Godard <ivan@ootbcomp.com> - 2014-01-13 12:47 -0800
Re: Implementation dependent behaviour (WAS: Re: Programming language and IDE design) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-01-14 14:16 +0000
csiph-web