Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #901
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Articles/books that discuss separating the context-free part of a language from the context-sensitive part? |
| Date | 2013-05-19 18:02 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <13-05-015@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <13-05-010@comp.compilers> <13-05-011@comp.compilers> |
On Sat, 18 May 2013 00:18:54 +0000 (UTC), glen herrmannsfeldt
<gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:
[snip]
>As I remember it, it is not so easy to do for recursive descent
>parsers. As a result, as noted, you get poor error messages, such as:
>
> SYNTAX ERROR
>
>somewhere near where the problem is. For languages with reserved works,
>it is nice to say exactly what the problem is. It gets more
It is nice for any language. When parsing string, I tend to
avoid complex regexes for the same reason. If I build an FSA, I can
often get specific on what the error is.
>interesting without reserved words. Yesterday, following a post
>in comp.lang.fortran I tried:
>
>TYPE :: DEEP
> TYPE(DEEP) :: POINTER
>END TYPE
>
>When compiling it, the error message, pointing right to the
>word POINTER, say "must have POINTER attribute".
>
>Fortunately it only took me a few seconds to figure out, and then
>laugh at it. But yes, you can get funny messages without reserved
>words.
Could you explain what the error was? I do not know modern
Fortran.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Articles/books that discuss separating the context-free part of a language from the context-sensitive part? "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> - 2013-05-17 20:57 +0000
Re: Articles/books that discuss separating the context-free part of a language from the context-sensitive part? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-05-18 00:18 +0000
Re: Articles/books that discuss separating the context-free part of a language from the context-sensitive part? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-05-19 18:02 -0700
Re: Articles/books that discuss separating the context-free part of a language from the context-sensitive part? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-05-20 03:17 +0000
Re: Articles/books that discuss separating the context-free part of a language from the context-sensitive part? Aleksey Demakov <ademakov@gmail.com> - 2013-05-18 16:52 +0400
Re: Articles/books that discuss separating the context-free part of a language from the context-sensitive part? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-20 10:53 +0000
Re: Articles/books that discuss separating the context-free part of a language from the context-sensitive part? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-05-20 23:24 -0700
precedence have both ways jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2013-05-30 23:21 -0400
Re: precedence have both ways glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-05-31 05:10 +0000
Re: precedence have both ways anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-31 10:54 +0000
csiph-web