Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.compilers > #823

Re: Green Compiler ?

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED!nerds-end
From "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups comp.compilers
Subject Re: Green Compiler ?
Date Sun, 30 Dec 2012 09:22:46 +0100
Organization cbb software GmbH
Lines 35
Sender johnl@iecc.com
Approved comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID <12-12-039@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References <12-12-010@comp.compilers> <12-12-013@comp.compilers> <12-12-023@comp.compilers> <12-12-027@comp.compilers> <12-12-033@comp.compilers>
Reply-To mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host news.iecc.com
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace leila.iecc.com 1356903563 42891 64.57.183.58 (30 Dec 2012 21:39:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To abuse@iecc.com
NNTP-Posting-Date Sun, 30 Dec 2012 21:39:23 +0000 (UTC)
Keywords code, performance
Posted-Date 30 Dec 2012 16:39:23 EST
X-submission-address compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives http://compilers.iecc.com
Xref csiph.com comp.compilers:823

Show key headers only | View raw


On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 12:57:52 -0500, George Neuner wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:11:23 +0100, "Nils M Holm" <nmh@t3x.org> wrote:
>
>>Why does a game *have to* use the maximum number of frames per
>>second? When a given number of frames per second is sufficient,
>>in the sense that additional frames will not make the video output
>>any smoother, why increase the frame rate further?
>
> Unfortunately, games are hardly the only offenders.  When I worked in
> medical imaging (circa mid 90's), there was a requirement to render
> cineloops at 66fps regardless of image size, pixel depth or 2D vs 3D
> processing.  There were no 3-D GPUs and SIMD CPUs of the day
> (UltraSparc, Pentium MMX, etc.) were not equal to many of the imaging
> tasks.  We had to use custom FPGA based hardware to achieve the
> required frame rates at a (halfway) reasonable (to the user) cost.
>
> AFAIA, medical cineloops still are required to be rendered at 66fps.
> Doesn't matter that 40fps is faster than almost any human can see.

I thought it so, but it seems urban legend. In late 90's I worked in a
project that in particular rendered waveforms (electrocardiogram). It was a
huge problem then as it required to run on a conventional PC. There was no
specific fps specification, but requirement that curves scrolled smoothly
to human eye. Experiments shown that only at 10ms refresh rate you stop
noticing curve's jitter.

Maybe there is some relation to aliasing issues. Certainly the brain needs
much more time for 3D scenes than for simple geometric shapes. And it is
probably way different for LED displays now than for tubes then.

--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Green Compiler ? Abid <abidmuslim@gmail.com> - 2012-12-20 02:00 -0800
  Re: Green Compiler ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-23 08:18 +0000
    Re: Green Compiler ? Peter Dassow <z80eu@arcor.de> - 2012-12-26 19:31 +0100
      Re: Green Compiler ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-28 03:09 +0000
      Re: Green Compiler ? Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> - 2012-12-28 08:35 +0100
        Re: Green Compiler ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-28 16:14 +0000
        Re: Green Compiler ? Peter Dassow <z80eu@arcor.de> - 2012-12-29 09:35 +0100
          Re: Green Compiler ? Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> - 2012-12-30 08:14 +0100
            Re: Green Compiler ? George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2012-12-31 01:24 -0500
              Re: Green Compiler ? "Jonathan Thornburg" <jthorn@astro.indiana.edu> - 2013-01-02 04:09 +0000
                Re: Green Compiler ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-01-02 18:29 +0000
              Re: Green Compiler ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-01-02 05:11 +0000
              Re: Green Compiler ? Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> - 2013-01-02 07:29 +0100
                Re: Green Compiler ? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-01-02 19:52 +0000
                Re: Green Compiler ? "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2013-01-04 08:59 -0600
  Re: Green Compiler ? "Nils M Holm" <nmh@t3x.org> - 2012-12-23 10:01 +0100
    Re: Green Compiler ? Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> - 2012-12-24 05:16 +0100
    Re: Green Compiler ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-12-27 13:36 +0000
      Re: Green Compiler ? "Nils M Holm" <nmh@t3x.org> - 2012-12-28 09:11 +0100
        Re: Green Compiler ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-12-28 16:57 +0000
        Re: Green Compiler ? George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2012-12-28 12:57 -0500
          Re: Green Compiler ? "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-12-30 09:22 +0100
    Re: Green Compiler ? Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2012-12-27 21:59 -0600
  Re: Green Compiler ? Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2012-12-28 10:42 -0500

csiph-web