Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.arch > #18036

Re: The Contract Model In Computer Architecture

Message-ID <5232B512.5000806@bitblocks.com> (permalink)
Date 2013-09-12 23:47 -0700
From Bakul Shah <usenet@bitblocks.com>
Newsgroups comp.arch
Subject Re: The Contract Model In Computer Architecture
References <6bf68af6-338f-44e5-8ff3-ea2cced65798@googlegroups.com> <522F4698.9090306@bitblocks.com> <56793e1b-ce99-4adc-b3e2-4991311ceeea@googlegroups.com>
Organization Sonic.Net

Show all headers | View raw


On 9/11/13 6:19 PM, seimarao@gmail.com wrote:
>> you need to provide some context. What led you to ask these questions,
>> what research (or web search) have you done to try to find answers,
>
> Hi,
>
>      I indeed did some research but dropped out thinking these are Sun(Oracle)'s
>      patents.
>
>      The context is stated below:
>
>      Consider Java Generics or for that matter .Net compilation.
>
>      Both utilize something called Dynamic Compilation where the same
>      set of instructions are utilized to execute different requirements.
>
>      While Generics are a bad example, the basic idea which I caught on
>      to was Hey, they are using dynamic compilation where only 1 image
>      exists. So, this means that a procedure sits somewhere inorder to
>      execute different types of code. Given Sparc's Register Windows
>      and its excessive bias towards procedural code, Design By Contract
>      could arguably equalize Sun with others.
>
>      The thinking that I forgot to remember :-) was to lay the path
>       between say, Lisp's Car & Lisp's Cat so there would be 1 image
>      executing on a Register Windows Machine that is Sparc.
>
>      I admit there exists a lapse but hidden patents rarely encourage
>      anyone to meditate excessively on such directions.

Many of the phrases you are using make sense separately but
not when they are used together like this!

Are you a student or studying all this on your own? Anyway,
comp.arch is not the right place for you. Suggest you find a
local teacher who can help untangle your confusion. Just
focus on learning to program using a programming language
your teacher or mentor is comfortable with.

Back to comp.arch | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The Contract Model In Computer Architecture seimarao@gmail.com - 2013-09-09 11:22 -0700
  Re: The Contract Model In Computer Architecture Bakul Shah <usenet@bitblocks.com> - 2013-09-10 09:19 -0700
    Re: The Contract Model In Computer Architecture seimarao@gmail.com - 2013-09-11 18:19 -0700
      Re: The Contract Model In Computer Architecture Raymond Wiker <rwiker@gmail.com> - 2013-09-12 19:19 +0200
      Re: The Contract Model In Computer Architecture Bakul Shah <usenet@bitblocks.com> - 2013-09-12 23:47 -0700
        Re: The Contract Model In Computer Architecture Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2013-09-22 07:56 -0700
          Re: The Contract Model In Computer Architecture Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2013-09-22 12:54 -0700
            Re: The Contract Model In Computer Architecture Bakul Shah <usenet@bitblocks.com> - 2013-09-23 00:02 -0700
            Re: The Contract Model In Computer Architecture Raymond Wiker <rwiker@gmail.com> - 2013-09-23 21:00 +0200
          Re: The Contract Model In Computer Architecture EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2013-09-22 19:19 -0400
  Re: The Contract Model In Computer Architecture MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2013-09-21 19:11 -0700

csiph-web