Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.fpga > #7484
| From | al.basili@gmail.com (alb) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded, comp.arch.fpga |
| Subject | processor core validation |
| Followup-To | comp.arch.embedded |
| Date | 2015-02-08 22:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cjq4nnFu1psU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Followups directed to: comp.arch.embedded
Hi everyone, I was wondering if anyone can point me to some formal method to validate a soft processor core. We have the source code (vhdl) and a simulation environment to load programs and execute them, but I'm not sure in this case code coeverage will be sufficient. What about cases like interrupt handling? I can run Dhrystone or CoreMark, but will it be sufficient? Any idea/pointer/comment is appreciated, Al -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Back to comp.arch.fpga | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
processor core validation al.basili@gmail.com (alb) - 2015-02-08 22:02 +0000 Re: processor core validation HT-Lab <hans64@htminuslab.com> - 2015-02-09 09:08 +0000 Re: processor core validation al.basili@gmail.com (alb) - 2015-02-11 22:12 +0000 Re: processor core validation "" <93490@FPGARelated> - 2015-03-28 12:11 -0500
csiph-web