Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #13523 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-09-12 16:43 -0700 |
| Last post | 2013-09-18 11:43 -0400 |
| Articles | 4 on this page of 24 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.arch.embedded
OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-12 16:43 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Martin Riddle <martin_rid@verizon.net> - 2013-09-12 20:05 -0400
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Jamie M <jmorken@shaw.ca> - 2013-09-12 19:36 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-13 17:53 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? chris <meru@devnull.com> - 2013-09-13 18:41 +0000
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2013-09-13 22:22 +0100
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-13 17:54 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Fred Abse <excretatauris@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-13 14:50 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Don Y <this@isnotme.com> - 2013-09-13 15:43 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2013-09-14 00:29 +0100
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-14 11:08 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> - 2013-09-15 15:23 -0400
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Don Y <this@isnotme.com> - 2013-09-15 20:17 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-16 07:47 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-13 17:54 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? nico@puntnl.niks (Nico Coesel) - 2013-09-14 00:16 +0000
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-13 17:57 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Jamie M <jmorken@shaw.ca> - 2013-09-14 18:06 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? chris <meru@devnull.com> - 2013-09-15 15:13 +0000
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Jamie M <jmorken@shaw.ca> - 2013-09-15 15:28 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-16 07:32 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2013-09-16 09:54 +0300
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-16 07:40 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? T <kd1s.nospam@cox.nospam.net> - 2013-09-18 11:43 -0400
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-16 07:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b9oj40Fs2ojU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #13588 |
Jamie M wrote: [...] > Crowd sourced cloud computing, I think businesses are not going to be > interested in this due to security for sure, but still interesting, > I think the beta for it just started in August2013. > > https://secure.slicify.com/ > I don't think our VC folks would go with that :-) They prefer a well-established commercial provider with a reputation. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-16 09:54 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <vg338p5cl4k.fsf@coffee.modeemi.fi> |
| In reply to | #13523 |
Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> writes: > Right now we are using an email provider and Dropbox for our start-up > company. However, we'd like to get a more integrated solution that has > all under one roof and preferably does not engage in vendor-lock. For > example, a solution that requires MS-Outlook is not a good solution. Maybe Funambol? They have a demo system at https://onemediahub.com/ but offer tailored setups for customers as well, webpage is http://funambol.com/solutions/hosting-saas.php. If read that correctly, one option is that they setup all you want on your hardware in your premises or alternative in theirs. No idea about the prices though but I'd look into this if I were in your shoes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-16 07:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b9ojk3Fs7nnU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #13622 |
Anssi Saari wrote: > Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> writes: > >> Right now we are using an email provider and Dropbox for our start-up >> company. However, we'd like to get a more integrated solution that has >> all under one roof and preferably does not engage in vendor-lock. For >> example, a solution that requires MS-Outlook is not a good solution. > > Maybe Funambol? They have a demo system at https://onemediahub.com/ but > offer tailored setups for customers as well, webpage is > http://funambol.com/solutions/hosting-saas.php. If read that correctly, > one option is that they setup all you want on your hardware in your > premises or alternative in theirs. No idea about the prices though but > I'd look into this if I were in your shoes. Thanks. "Call sales rep for pricing" usually means $$$ but a quick glance around the web seems to hint that pricing could be reasonable: http://www.connect-world.com/~cwiml/index.php/press-releases/item/11512-funambol-upgrades-mobile-cloud-service-with-price-plans But support seems not so great and no encryption. The latter would be a show stopper for us. http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/cloud/cloud-storage/220-myfunambol-reviewed -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | T <kd1s.nospam@cox.nospam.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-18 11:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.2ca3941abfff88f0989ed3@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #13622 |
In article <vg338p5cl4k.fsf@coffee.modeemi.fi>, as@sci.fi says... > > Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> writes: > > > Right now we are using an email provider and Dropbox for our start-up > > company. However, we'd like to get a more integrated solution that has > > all under one roof and preferably does not engage in vendor-lock. For > > example, a solution that requires MS-Outlook is not a good solution. > > Maybe Funambol? They have a demo system at https://onemediahub.com/ but > offer tailored setups for customers as well, webpage is > http://funambol.com/solutions/hosting-saas.php. If read that correctly, > one option is that they setup all you want on your hardware in your > premises or alternative in theirs. No idea about the prices though but > I'd look into this if I were in your shoes. Bluehost.com - cheap and reliable.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | comp.arch.embedded
csiph-web