Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #31030
| From | pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | MCU reset and internal SRAM starting values |
| Date | 2022-04-06 13:37 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <t2ju2f$eff$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
I often use with success a simple way to implement a bootloader:
#define START_MAGIC 0xAA55AA55
uint32_t start_application __attribute__((section=".noinit"));
void main(void) {
...
if (start_application == START_MAGIC) {
start_application = ~START_MAGIC;
launch_application();
}
/* Stay in bootloader and wait for new application from
* USART, SPI, USB, whatever. */
...
start_application = START_MAGIC;
ResetMCU(); /* It's NVIC_SystemReset() */
}
I don't use launch_application() after download, because I think it
isn't good to start the application with some already configured
peripherals (USART, SPI, USB). I know I can deinitialize peripherals and
clocks before launch_application(), but the technique above it's much
more simple.
Of course, start_application variable shouldn't be touched after a
reset, so I put it in noinit section.
Recently I tried to implement a bootloader on a LPC546XX from NXP and I
noticed it didn't work. After some investigation I found that
start_application variable is reset to zero immediately after ResetMCU().
After other investigation I noticed that the first 4kB space of SRAM
doesn't change after a reset, while the next 4kB space is really put to
zero.
I changed the location of start_application variable to the first 4kB
space and the bootloader started working perfectly.
This is the first time I see this behaviour, so my question.
When can you trust that internal SRAM content isn't changed when the MCU
core is reset?
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
MCU reset and internal SRAM starting values pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2022-04-06 13:37 +0200
Re: MCU reset and internal SRAM starting values Stef <me@this.is.invalid> - 2022-04-06 14:07 +0200
Re: MCU reset and internal SRAM starting values pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2022-04-06 15:45 +0200
csiph-web