Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #25827
| From | pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: Suggestions on solutions to develop an embedded web server over Ethernet interface |
| Date | 2017-02-13 00:36 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <o7qrdq$fea$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <o7kt2p$36s$1@dont-email.me> <BEl*xg4jw@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> |
Il 10/02/2017 19:28, Theo Markettos ha scritto: >> Is there a low-size low-cost embedded Linux solution? Maybe a cheap >> System On Module (with processor and some volatile and non-volatile >> memories)? > > You could have a look at the Raspberry Pi Compute Modules. The I/O is a bit > limited (GPIO is good, but ethernet is hung off USB) but they have a good > software update story and the community documentation is very good. I don't > recall the supply lifetime guarantees for the SoMs but I think they do > exist. Recently Raspberry company released a new version of Compute Module, named CM3 (Compute Module 3). I already used the original CM1 version in an old project. I think Raspberry solutions are very good if the project provides an HDMI interface, otherwise I think there are better solutions at a similar price. In my current project, where I need an Ethernet interface, CM SOMs aren't good because, as you wrote, Ethernet is not CPU native. The cheapest embedded Linux SOM I know is A13-SOM-256 from Olimex[1]. It is sold for 18EUR (12.60EUR@1000pcs). It is cheaper than CM1 and CM3 from Raspberry. However A13-SOM-256 (and is big brother A13-SOM-512) doesn't provide Ethernet connectivity (I think because A13 CPU from Allwinner hasn't this feature natively). We need the A20-SOM to have Ethernet connectivity, but the price rises to 40EUR (30.10EUR@1000pcs). Maybe adding a USB/Ethernet bride (such as LAN9512 from Microchip) to A13-SOM-256 is cheaper than A20-SOM (but I don't know what the performance will be). Another nice SOM is CORE9X35[2] from CoreWind. It is a SMD SOM running Linux and provides and Ethernet interface with integrated PHY. The price of the model with 256MB is only 36USD (32.4USD@1000pcs) [1] https://www.olimex.com/Products/SOM/A13/A13-SOM-256/ [2] http://www.armdevs.com/Product/CORE9X35.html
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Suggestions on solutions to develop an embedded web server over Ethernet interface pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 18:27 +0100
Re: Suggestions on solutions to develop an embedded web server over Ethernet interface Theo Markettos <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2017-02-10 18:28 +0000
Re: Suggestions on solutions to develop an embedded web server over Ethernet interface pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 00:36 +0100
Re: Suggestions on solutions to develop an embedded web server over Ethernet interface pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 00:36 +0100
Re: Suggestions on solutions to develop an embedded web server over Ethernet interface Theo Markettos <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2017-02-13 08:04 +0000
Re: Suggestions on solutions to develop an embedded web server over Ethernet interface Joe Chisolm <jchisolm6@earthlink.net> - 2017-02-10 13:52 -0600
Re: Suggestions on solutions to develop an embedded web server over Ethernet interface Uwe Bonnes <bon@hertz.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> - 2017-02-13 11:43 +0000
Re: Suggestions on solutions to develop an embedded web server over Ethernet interface Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-10 12:59 -0700
Re: Suggestions on solutions to develop an embedded web server over Ethernet interface Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2017-02-10 14:13 -0600
Re: Suggestions on solutions to develop an embedded web server over Ethernet interface aquaverde <svaquaverde@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-10 17:09 -0800
Re: Suggestions on solutions to develop an embedded web server over Ethernet interface Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-13 01:02 -0800
csiph-web